<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Keefe to appear before House Science Committee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/02/09/okeefe-to-appear-before-house-science-committee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/02/09/okeefe-to-appear-before-house-science-committee/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=okeefe-to-appear-before-house-science-committee</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/02/09/okeefe-to-appear-before-house-science-committee/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=60#comment-122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that Mr. William Readdy who responded to the unknown Word document regarding how safe a shuttle mission would (or would not) be to Hubble vs. the Space Station simply does not want &quot;the pressure&quot;. Perhaps it is he and Mr. O&#039;Keefe (among others in NASA) who need to be &quot;pulled from orbit.&quot;

Regardless of the project, NASA needs leaders who will address problems and solve them... not run and hide from tough issues because there might be pressure. With logic such as that of Mr. O&#039;Keefe and Readdy, the world would still be planted firmly on earth, gazing through the haze of an earth-bound telescope.

NASA needs leaders... not managers. There is a job to be done to continue the Hubble work. If they cannot lead the work then get out of the way for someone who can. NASA is no place for someone who runs scared for their job.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that Mr. William Readdy who responded to the unknown Word document regarding how safe a shuttle mission would (or would not) be to Hubble vs. the Space Station simply does not want &#8220;the pressure&#8221;. Perhaps it is he and Mr. O&#8217;Keefe (among others in NASA) who need to be &#8220;pulled from orbit.&#8221;</p>
<p>Regardless of the project, NASA needs leaders who will address problems and solve them&#8230; not run and hide from tough issues because there might be pressure. With logic such as that of Mr. O&#8217;Keefe and Readdy, the world would still be planted firmly on earth, gazing through the haze of an earth-bound telescope.</p>
<p>NASA needs leaders&#8230; not managers. There is a job to be done to continue the Hubble work. If they cannot lead the work then get out of the way for someone who can. NASA is no place for someone who runs scared for their job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anaxagoras</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/02/09/okeefe-to-appear-before-house-science-committee/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anaxagoras]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=60#comment-121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just hope the business of the new space initiative isn&#039;t lost in the glare of the controversy over the Hubble Space Telescope. I fear that the Hubble controversy is causing such a distraction that NASA will have a difficult time focusing on the new initiative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope the business of the new space initiative isn&#8217;t lost in the glare of the controversy over the Hubble Space Telescope. I fear that the Hubble controversy is causing such a distraction that NASA will have a difficult time focusing on the new initiative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
