<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA authorization bill introduced in the Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mealling</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Mealling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=213#comment-676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read it. I&#039;m not to impressed with how what the Commission said was translated into legi-speak. Especially as it relates to Section 305 and 306.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read it. I&#8217;m not to impressed with how what the Commission said was translated into legi-speak. Especially as it relates to Section 305 and 306.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Muncy</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Muncy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=213#comment-675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back to the NASA Authorization bill...

It&#039;s title is &quot;a bill to reauthorize and restructure the National Aeronautics and Space Administration&quot;.  

Sponsors: McCain, Brownback, Hutchison, Allen

That means it has backing from the full spectrum of (GOP) space views on the Commerce Committee: 

reformer, visionary, JSC defender, and aeronautics defender.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to the NASA Authorization bill&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s title is &#8220;a bill to reauthorize and restructure the National Aeronautics and Space Administration&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Sponsors: McCain, Brownback, Hutchison, Allen</p>
<p>That means it has backing from the full spectrum of (GOP) space views on the Commerce Committee: </p>
<p>reformer, visionary, JSC defender, and aeronautics defender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold LaValley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold LaValley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2004 03:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=213#comment-674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a tid bit that is a hint of what Nasa might also do with the commissions report.

NASA Ponders Shuttle Flight Without Two Key Changes

NASA is considering whether it can return its space shuttles to flight without making two safety improvements that have so far proved to be high hurdles for agency engineers, top officials said on Friday. After the space shuttle Columbia disintegrated over Texas last year and killed.

NASA engineers are working on a repair kit that could fix a large hole in a shuttle wing&#039;s leading edge. They are also trying to build a boom to inspect the orbiter&#039;s underside.

The tasks have proved challenging, so the space agency is considering whether it can launch the shuttles without those two upgrades.


http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=scienceNews&amp;storyID=5461206&amp;section=news]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a tid bit that is a hint of what Nasa might also do with the commissions report.</p>
<p>NASA Ponders Shuttle Flight Without Two Key Changes</p>
<p>NASA is considering whether it can return its space shuttles to flight without making two safety improvements that have so far proved to be high hurdles for agency engineers, top officials said on Friday. After the space shuttle Columbia disintegrated over Texas last year and killed.</p>
<p>NASA engineers are working on a repair kit that could fix a large hole in a shuttle wing&#8217;s leading edge. They are also trying to build a boom to inspect the orbiter&#8217;s underside.</p>
<p>The tasks have proved challenging, so the space agency is considering whether it can launch the shuttles without those two upgrades.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=scienceNews&#038;storyID=5461206&#038;section=news" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=scienceNews&#038;storyID=5461206&#038;section=news</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry A. Noriega</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perry A. Noriega]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2004 00:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=213#comment-673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am frankly not surprised at the apparent contradictions in the Aldridge report, and the Columbia Accident Investigation report, with regards to operations vs. outsourcing. The entire system of social, economic, political, technological, and other systems are in a state of radical change, like it or not. Dynamism and Network Means theory explain a lot of this, and only through experimentation, trial and error, and working on specific projects via Networked Means will the Space Community as a whole, not just NASA management, and society as a whole who are potential converts to the spacefaring cause, will change this. This will answer the questions as to what specific missions would investigate, search, or build. Robots and people must work where each has a comparative advantage, in the economic sense, to be truly efficient and effective. But only the trial and error of a dynamist approach will do this, not just the skeletal beginnings of government master planning. 

In the book Space, The Dormant Frontier, Joan Johnson-Freese stated towards the end of the book that profit slowly was taking precedence over politics in driving space activity, and it was inevitable. And the prize commentary is very encouraging; I hope we see much more of it. 

Trans Orbital has a spacecraft nearly ready to go to lunar orbit this fall, I wonder if it qualifies as a “non-government”, private sector managed robotic missions to the moon in three years qualifies. By my reckoning, I think it does. 

And most importantly, If I had a chance to exert my property rights in space via a mechanism that gives me title to and asteroid, or part of the moon, and this property right is a real thing, not an artificial construct to make someone else rich, that would be the best thing that happens for space settlement/development in the first decade of the Twenty First Century, in my opinion. 

I just hope the Oligarchy and the Demopublicans, and Republicrats will allow this to happen. They have a very bad, entrenched habit of strangling new things in their cradles, particularly where threats to their control and power over life on earth, commerce, industry, etc, they now have, emerge. Space is a very big threat to geocentric oligarchy, and I can only hope the Space Community comes together to support with no compromise anything and everything that gets real hardware that is Frontier Enabling into space, and establishes space property rights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am frankly not surprised at the apparent contradictions in the Aldridge report, and the Columbia Accident Investigation report, with regards to operations vs. outsourcing. The entire system of social, economic, political, technological, and other systems are in a state of radical change, like it or not. Dynamism and Network Means theory explain a lot of this, and only through experimentation, trial and error, and working on specific projects via Networked Means will the Space Community as a whole, not just NASA management, and society as a whole who are potential converts to the spacefaring cause, will change this. This will answer the questions as to what specific missions would investigate, search, or build. Robots and people must work where each has a comparative advantage, in the economic sense, to be truly efficient and effective. But only the trial and error of a dynamist approach will do this, not just the skeletal beginnings of government master planning. </p>
<p>In the book Space, The Dormant Frontier, Joan Johnson-Freese stated towards the end of the book that profit slowly was taking precedence over politics in driving space activity, and it was inevitable. And the prize commentary is very encouraging; I hope we see much more of it. </p>
<p>Trans Orbital has a spacecraft nearly ready to go to lunar orbit this fall, I wonder if it qualifies as a “non-government”, private sector managed robotic missions to the moon in three years qualifies. By my reckoning, I think it does. </p>
<p>And most importantly, If I had a chance to exert my property rights in space via a mechanism that gives me title to and asteroid, or part of the moon, and this property right is a real thing, not an artificial construct to make someone else rich, that would be the best thing that happens for space settlement/development in the first decade of the Twenty First Century, in my opinion. </p>
<p>I just hope the Oligarchy and the Demopublicans, and Republicrats will allow this to happen. They have a very bad, entrenched habit of strangling new things in their cradles, particularly where threats to their control and power over life on earth, commerce, industry, etc, they now have, emerge. Space is a very big threat to geocentric oligarchy, and I can only hope the Space Community comes together to support with no compromise anything and everything that gets real hardware that is Frontier Enabling into space, and establishes space property rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold LaValley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold LaValley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=213#comment-672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So ok I am no rocket scientist but I will still try to learn as I can. Here is a link that sort of explains why we can not cobble design a rocket from existing parts and why a design review of selected parts would need to be done.

“Off The Shelf” To Orbit Doesn’t Exist

http://www.rocketmanblog.com/2004/02/off_the_shelf_t.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So ok I am no rocket scientist but I will still try to learn as I can. Here is a link that sort of explains why we can not cobble design a rocket from existing parts and why a design review of selected parts would need to be done.</p>
<p>“Off The Shelf” To Orbit Doesn’t Exist</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rocketmanblog.com/2004/02/off_the_shelf_t.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rocketmanblog.com/2004/02/off_the_shelf_t.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=213#comment-671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if the Brownback bill doesn&#039;t pass, it represents an evolution in the way some in Congress are willing to think when it comes to space activities. Rohrbacher&#039;s bills also demonstrate this. 

I certainly share the frustration with others that we seem to be plodding along and getting very little done, but on the other hand we appear to be moving slowly in the right direction conceptually - recognizing that the commercial sector will ultimately represent the bulk of space activities in the future. We will likely not see this day come to pass in our lifetimes, but we will witness the first grappling hooks sail over the wall separating the Earth from the great black yonder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the Brownback bill doesn&#8217;t pass, it represents an evolution in the way some in Congress are willing to think when it comes to space activities. Rohrbacher&#8217;s bills also demonstrate this. </p>
<p>I certainly share the frustration with others that we seem to be plodding along and getting very little done, but on the other hand we appear to be moving slowly in the right direction conceptually &#8211; recognizing that the commercial sector will ultimately represent the bulk of space activities in the future. We will likely not see this day come to pass in our lifetimes, but we will witness the first grappling hooks sail over the wall separating the Earth from the great black yonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold LaValley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold LaValley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=213#comment-670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even after a bill were to be signed allocating the funds. 
Who would define the mission parameters, NASA or the Private sector?
What would the mission investigate, search for or build? 
Is it just to prove that robots can do what man can not, or is it to lead the way for man?
I have more questions than answers for who will control space exploration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even after a bill were to be signed allocating the funds.<br />
Who would define the mission parameters, NASA or the Private sector?<br />
What would the mission investigate, search for or build?<br />
Is it just to prove that robots can do what man can not, or is it to lead the way for man?<br />
I have more questions than answers for who will control space exploration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kert</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=213#comment-669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Kennedy is an operational center,&quot; Weldon said. &quot;It&#039;s not going to be workable.&quot; 

Well, the very same report recommends for NASA to get out of the operations. Make your own conclusions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Kennedy is an operational center,&#8221; Weldon said. &#8220;It&#8217;s not going to be workable.&#8221; </p>
<p>Well, the very same report recommends for NASA to get out of the operations. Make your own conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold LaValley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold LaValley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=213#comment-668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just the tip of the resistance to change.

Officials shun KSC- university concept 
Converting Kennedy Space Center into a university-run research facility won&#039;t work, Florida lawmakers said Thursday
the only NASA center where humans are launched into space.

http://www.floridatoday.com/news/space/stories/2004b/spacestoryN0618NASAREPORT.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just the tip of the resistance to change.</p>
<p>Officials shun KSC- university concept<br />
Converting Kennedy Space Center into a university-run research facility won&#8217;t work, Florida lawmakers said Thursday<br />
the only NASA center where humans are launched into space.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.floridatoday.com/news/space/stories/2004b/spacestoryN0618NASAREPORT.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.floridatoday.com/news/space/stories/2004b/spacestoryN0618NASAREPORT.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/06/17/nasa-authorization-bill-introduced-in-the-senate/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Webster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 04:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=213#comment-667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviation/article/0,12543,458498-3,00.html

Upon reading it again, I realize that he actually hopes to be doing something MORE exciting than this.  Still, I hope someone follows up with this idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviation/article/0,12543,458498-3,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviation/article/0,12543,458498-3,00.html</a></p>
<p>Upon reading it again, I realize that he actually hopes to be doing something MORE exciting than this.  Still, I hope someone follows up with this idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
