<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Commerce Committee and the NASA authorization bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/09/22/senate-commerce-committee-and-the-nasa-authorization-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/09/22/senate-commerce-committee-and-the-nasa-authorization-bill/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=senate-commerce-committee-and-the-nasa-authorization-bill</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/09/22/senate-commerce-committee-and-the-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=308#comment-1487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Folks, you have to keep the different bills and amendments straight.  Jeff&#039;s original post was about the NASA Authorization bill being considered in the Senate Commerce Committee.  The &quot;controversial&quot; amendment to that Authorization bill is indeed described by Sen. Hutchison (R-TX)&#039;s news release cited above on Spaceref, basically says that the Space Shuttle should continue flying until AFTER a U.S. CEV is flying.  The fact that there is no money to develop a CEV without retiring the Shuttle seems to be completely lost on Sen. Hutchison.  

That is why there was controversy at the markup.  


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks, you have to keep the different bills and amendments straight.  Jeff&#8217;s original post was about the NASA Authorization bill being considered in the Senate Commerce Committee.  The &#8220;controversial&#8221; amendment to that Authorization bill is indeed described by Sen. Hutchison (R-TX)&#8217;s news release cited above on Spaceref, basically says that the Space Shuttle should continue flying until AFTER a U.S. CEV is flying.  The fact that there is no money to develop a CEV without retiring the Shuttle seems to be completely lost on Sen. Hutchison.  </p>
<p>That is why there was controversy at the markup.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/09/22/senate-commerce-committee-and-the-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2004 00:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=308#comment-1486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did anyone see anything in this bill related to the search for Earth-like planets?  It seems with the new discovery of two new Neptune-sized planets that this would be a hotter topic and something Congress should be encouraging.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone see anything in this bill related to the search for Earth-like planets?  It seems with the new discovery of two new Neptune-sized planets that this would be a hotter topic and something Congress should be encouraging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Malkin</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/09/22/senate-commerce-committee-and-the-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Malkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=308#comment-1485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In American English they are saying they support the money but they don&#039;t want the blame for spending the money.  They want the blame to go to the entire senate and/or house.  What would we do without politics?  That is rhetorical.

At least they are talking about space, Americans may yet get out of earth orbit before the quater century.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In American English they are saying they support the money but they don&#8217;t want the blame for spending the money.  They want the blame to go to the entire senate and/or house.  What would we do without politics?  That is rhetorical.</p>
<p>At least they are talking about space, Americans may yet get out of earth orbit before the quater century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold LaValley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/09/22/senate-commerce-committee-and-the-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold LaValley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=308#comment-1484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Space Watch: NASA gets a budget boost
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040921-055443-8222R

Quote:
If the bill and amendment package approved by the Appropriations Committee actually does arrive on the Senate floor, some Democrats who approved the measure in the committee warned that a fight is looming. 

&quot;I&#039;m not going to offer an amendment today,&quot; said Sen. Byron L. Dorgan, D-N.D. &quot;But this needs to be addressed on the floor of the Senate.&quot; 

Even Stevens warned inflating the budget with emergency spending measures was likely to trigger other objections. 

&quot;(The White House Office of Management and Budget) is disturbed by the level of emergencies we&#039;ve been spending,&quot; Stevens said. 

Others who wound up supporting Mikulski&#039;s move did so reluctantly. 

&quot;I support this amendment, but I don&#039;t like supporting this amendment,&quot; said Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan. 

end qoute

Well which is it do you or do you not support the amendment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Space Watch: NASA gets a budget boost<br />
<a href="http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040921-055443-8222R" rel="nofollow">http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040921-055443-8222R</a></p>
<p>Quote:<br />
If the bill and amendment package approved by the Appropriations Committee actually does arrive on the Senate floor, some Democrats who approved the measure in the committee warned that a fight is looming. </p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not going to offer an amendment today,&#8221; said Sen. Byron L. Dorgan, D-N.D. &#8220;But this needs to be addressed on the floor of the Senate.&#8221; </p>
<p>Even Stevens warned inflating the budget with emergency spending measures was likely to trigger other objections. </p>
<p>&#8220;(The White House Office of Management and Budget) is disturbed by the level of emergencies we&#8217;ve been spending,&#8221; Stevens said. </p>
<p>Others who wound up supporting Mikulski&#8217;s move did so reluctantly. </p>
<p>&#8220;I support this amendment, but I don&#8217;t like supporting this amendment,&#8221; said Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan. </p>
<p>end qoute</p>
<p>Well which is it do you or do you not support the amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold LaValley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/09/22/senate-commerce-committee-and-the-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold LaValley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=308#comment-1483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Status of FY2005 Appropriations Bills

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/approp/app05.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Status of FY2005 Appropriations Bills</p>
<p><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/home/approp/app05.html" rel="nofollow">http://thomas.loc.gov/home/approp/app05.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold LaValley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/09/22/senate-commerce-committee-and-the-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold LaValley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=308#comment-1482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article fills in the gap on the why an amendment was put forth with the extra money for shuttle and hubble.

Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Approves NASA Authorization Act 
Includes Amendment Introduced by Sen. Hutchison to Maintain U.S. Access to Space

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=15100]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article fills in the gap on the why an amendment was put forth with the extra money for shuttle and hubble.</p>
<p>Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Approves NASA Authorization Act<br />
Includes Amendment Introduced by Sen. Hutchison to Maintain U.S. Access to Space</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=15100" rel="nofollow">http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=15100</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
