Comments on: Weldon and Feeney rebut Glenn http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/10/30/weldon-and-feeney-rebut-glenn/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=weldon-and-feeney-rebut-glenn Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 By: Jim Rohrich http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/10/30/weldon-and-feeney-rebut-glenn/#comment-1894 Wed, 03 Nov 2004 22:11:52 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=330#comment-1894 Gee, I wonder how Mr. Glenn feels today?

]]> By: Philip Littrell http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/10/30/weldon-and-feeney-rebut-glenn/#comment-1893 Sun, 31 Oct 2004 07:32:29 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=330#comment-1893 The Washington Times has published an editorial on space policy, two days before the election:

Bush’s bold space policy
October 31, 2004
http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20041030-102528-5674r.htm

“The election on Nov. 2 will have many far-reaching implications, not the least of which is mankind’s fledgling reach into space.”

“The contrasts are stark. A Kerry administration would delay — if not doom — America’s reach into space.”

It’s not a perfect editorial, but it gets the main points right: there is a big difference between the two space policies in this election, and only Bush will provide a good future for space exploration and human spaceflight.

]]> By: Keith Cowing http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/10/30/weldon-and-feeney-rebut-glenn/#comment-1892 Sun, 31 Oct 2004 02:10:05 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=330#comment-1892 Unlike Glenn who was free to write whatever he wished, Fenney and Weldon were only allowed a limited number of words to reply – 200 as I am told.

]]>