<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This week at TSR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=this-week-at-tsr</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogsbd</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dogsbd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=349#comment-2013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;Hey, Dogsbd, I&#039;m on your side! I guess I&#039;d better start taking potshots.

So sorry, I thought you were directing that... well somewhere other than where you were ;-)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Hey, Dogsbd, I&#8217;m on your side! I guess I&#8217;d better start taking potshots.</p>
<p>So sorry, I thought you were directing that&#8230; well somewhere other than where you were <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Ziarnick</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Ziarnick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=349#comment-2012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, Dogsbd, I&#039;m on your side!  I guess I&#039;d better start taking potshots.

Greg, did we really have to read your leftist propaganda in Space News, too?  First you said your values told you you had to vote against space and for Kerry.  Now, you try to deny that the only president who has said anything of interest about space in a decade really doesn&#039;t mean it?  He just lied to win the votes of the vast untapped pool of space activist voters?  Bush can do no right!

Oh, and Sam Dinkin, do you have to bring up  Imperial hubris?  Please, leave the MoveOn cliches at home!  International relations isn&#039;t your strong suit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Dogsbd, I&#8217;m on your side!  I guess I&#8217;d better start taking potshots.</p>
<p>Greg, did we really have to read your leftist propaganda in Space News, too?  First you said your values told you you had to vote against space and for Kerry.  Now, you try to deny that the only president who has said anything of interest about space in a decade really doesn&#8217;t mean it?  He just lied to win the votes of the vast untapped pool of space activist voters?  Bush can do no right!</p>
<p>Oh, and Sam Dinkin, do you have to bring up  Imperial hubris?  Please, leave the MoveOn cliches at home!  International relations isn&#8217;t your strong suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogsbd</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/#comment-2011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dogsbd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=349#comment-2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;Sniping it is!

That is rich. Any and all manner of lies can be told of the Bush administration and it&#039;s policies but as soon as someone from MY side of the aisle counters it&#039;s deemed to be &quot;sniping&quot;.

Cowing hit the head square on the nail, many are &quot;clearly suffering from sour grapes&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Sniping it is!</p>
<p>That is rich. Any and all manner of lies can be told of the Bush administration and it&#8217;s policies but as soon as someone from MY side of the aisle counters it&#8217;s deemed to be &#8220;sniping&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cowing hit the head square on the nail, many are &#8220;clearly suffering from sour grapes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Ziarnick</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/#comment-2010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Ziarnick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 06:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=349#comment-2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sniping it is!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sniping it is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark R. Whittington</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark R. Whittington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=349#comment-2009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, Nathan, Greg accused me of slander, not I he, though I take your point about it being a civil rather than criminal matter. However, even a casual reading of what he wrote shows the Nazi comparison. Greg&#039;s &quot;moveon.org&quot; form of political discourse is poison, in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Nathan, Greg accused me of slander, not I he, though I take your point about it being a civil rather than criminal matter. However, even a casual reading of what he wrote shows the Nazi comparison. Greg&#8217;s &#8220;moveon.org&#8221; form of political discourse is poison, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Malkin</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Malkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 04:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=349#comment-2008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However I think it&#039;s important that we voice our concerns to our representatives.  It’s one thing to fine tune your opinions by listening to counterpoint but debates here have limited impact in our government who will make the policies for the future of space.  We as world citizens must be vigilant and voice our opinion to the people that matter including participating in activist groups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However I think it&#8217;s important that we voice our concerns to our representatives.  It’s one thing to fine tune your opinions by listening to counterpoint but debates here have limited impact in our government who will make the policies for the future of space.  We as world citizens must be vigilant and voice our opinion to the people that matter including participating in activist groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Horsley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/#comment-2007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan Horsley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=349#comment-2007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really wish people would stop throwing around legal terms they know little about and that add little to a rational discourse.  Mark, slander is not a crime, it is actionable as a civil claim (not offense).  Accusing one of slander is itself not slanderous per se.  But Greg&#039;s statements don&#039;t come anywhere close to slander regardless.  In my opinion he merely made an observation about the relationship between agitprop and slander, then talked about you.  While there is a class of slander by insinuation, it is disaproved (rightly) by the courts in that most heated debate can imply technically slanderous statements.  Greg, Mark&#039;s statements, while inacurrate according to interpretation, in my opinion almost certainly does not amount to actionable slander.  He just made a questionable association in the course of a public argument.  (none of the above is intended as legal advice)  

&quot;Bigger picture, I hope that we Americans can learn to discuss these issues without making personal attacks or fueling personal animosities.

If I have ever attacked anyone personally, I apologize and will resolve not to do it again. If any one seeks to attack me personally because my views differ from their views, well, I am sorry but I am an SOB with strong opinions. But I will still buy the beer if asked nicely enough even if we disagree.&quot;

Well said Bill.  I ditto that.  

The election is over and now we just have to work with the circumstances at hand.  Neither complaining nor gloating seems functional or becoming.  I for one think the VSE is a huge step up from the space policy that existed previously, and we should all try to unite to ensure it gets funded.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish people would stop throwing around legal terms they know little about and that add little to a rational discourse.  Mark, slander is not a crime, it is actionable as a civil claim (not offense).  Accusing one of slander is itself not slanderous per se.  But Greg&#8217;s statements don&#8217;t come anywhere close to slander regardless.  In my opinion he merely made an observation about the relationship between agitprop and slander, then talked about you.  While there is a class of slander by insinuation, it is disaproved (rightly) by the courts in that most heated debate can imply technically slanderous statements.  Greg, Mark&#8217;s statements, while inacurrate according to interpretation, in my opinion almost certainly does not amount to actionable slander.  He just made a questionable association in the course of a public argument.  (none of the above is intended as legal advice)  </p>
<p>&#8220;Bigger picture, I hope that we Americans can learn to discuss these issues without making personal attacks or fueling personal animosities.</p>
<p>If I have ever attacked anyone personally, I apologize and will resolve not to do it again. If any one seeks to attack me personally because my views differ from their views, well, I am sorry but I am an SOB with strong opinions. But I will still buy the beer if asked nicely enough even if we disagree.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well said Bill.  I ditto that.  </p>
<p>The election is over and now we just have to work with the circumstances at hand.  Neither complaining nor gloating seems functional or becoming.  I for one think the VSE is a huge step up from the space policy that existed previously, and we should all try to unite to ensure it gets funded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill White</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=349#comment-2006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ignoring all the usual space advocate suspects, I believe &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200401/langewiesche&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;William Langewiesche&lt;/a&gt; nails the critical issue here. Keep Media allows access to the full essay, IIRC.

If we are to become a two planet species spreading American values (and babies) out into the solar system, full speed ahead. If not, or if becoming a two planet species is more than a century away, send robots and end ALL humans in space funded at US taxpayer expense. 

Branson wants to pay? Hey, no problem mate, its a free country. 

That&#039;s my position in a nutshell. 

Langeweische is also correct that people on all sides of space advocacy debates tend not to argue fairly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignoring all the usual space advocate suspects, I believe <a HREF="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200401/langewiesche" rel="nofollow">William Langewiesche</a> nails the critical issue here. Keep Media allows access to the full essay, IIRC.</p>
<p>If we are to become a two planet species spreading American values (and babies) out into the solar system, full speed ahead. If not, or if becoming a two planet species is more than a century away, send robots and end ALL humans in space funded at US taxpayer expense. </p>
<p>Branson wants to pay? Hey, no problem mate, its a free country. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s my position in a nutshell. </p>
<p>Langeweische is also correct that people on all sides of space advocacy debates tend not to argue fairly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill White</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=349#comment-2005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keith Cowing, how many people where thinking &quot;space policy&quot; when they pulled the lever on November 2nd? 

Not many IMHO. 

Frankly, I very much do hope Congress enacts the VSE as it is the only game in town for the next four years, maybe longer, despite it flaws. As far as current voting in the House and Senate, I have and will continue to support FULL FUNDING for the VSE in FY&#039;05 and FY &#039;06.

But if Congress does not enact the VSE then VSE will not be &quot;America&#039;s space policy&quot; and it won&#039;t be anyone&#039;s space vision, it will only be &quot;what might have been&quot; - - and to seek to squelch debate and discussion to push the VSE through as a &lt;i&gt;fait accompli&lt;/i&gt; merely creates resentment that will resurface in the future.

While Zubrin versus Spudis ain&#039;t good for anyone telling Zubrin to just &quot;shut up&quot; won&#039;t work since Zubrin won&#039;t just dry up and go away, especially after General Worden (for example) has now started calling for privately funded one way human trips to Mars, ASAP.

= = =

Bigger picture, I hope that we Americans can learn to discuss these issues without making personal attacks or fueling personal animosities. 

If I have ever attacked anyone personally, I apologize and will resolve not to do it again. If any one seeks to attack me personally because my views differ from their views, well, I am sorry but I am an SOB with strong opinions. But I will still buy the beer if asked nicely enough even if we disagree. 

Neither Zubrin or Spudis (or their followers) are going to disappear from the scene. Therefore we need to find a way to share our disagreements without letting it get personal or feeling the need to shout the other guy down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith Cowing, how many people where thinking &#8220;space policy&#8221; when they pulled the lever on November 2nd? </p>
<p>Not many IMHO. </p>
<p>Frankly, I very much do hope Congress enacts the VSE as it is the only game in town for the next four years, maybe longer, despite it flaws. As far as current voting in the House and Senate, I have and will continue to support FULL FUNDING for the VSE in FY&#8217;05 and FY &#8217;06.</p>
<p>But if Congress does not enact the VSE then VSE will not be &#8220;America&#8217;s space policy&#8221; and it won&#8217;t be anyone&#8217;s space vision, it will only be &#8220;what might have been&#8221; &#8211; &#8211; and to seek to squelch debate and discussion to push the VSE through as a <i>fait accompli</i> merely creates resentment that will resurface in the future.</p>
<p>While Zubrin versus Spudis ain&#8217;t good for anyone telling Zubrin to just &#8220;shut up&#8221; won&#8217;t work since Zubrin won&#8217;t just dry up and go away, especially after General Worden (for example) has now started calling for privately funded one way human trips to Mars, ASAP.</p>
<p>= = =</p>
<p>Bigger picture, I hope that we Americans can learn to discuss these issues without making personal attacks or fueling personal animosities. </p>
<p>If I have ever attacked anyone personally, I apologize and will resolve not to do it again. If any one seeks to attack me personally because my views differ from their views, well, I am sorry but I am an SOB with strong opinions. But I will still buy the beer if asked nicely enough even if we disagree. </p>
<p>Neither Zubrin or Spudis (or their followers) are going to disappear from the scene. Therefore we need to find a way to share our disagreements without letting it get personal or feeling the need to shout the other guy down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogsbd</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/11/15/this-week-at-tsr/#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dogsbd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=349#comment-2004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just how many government policies are devised from their very inception fully in the public arena? I suspect some would rather Bush would have conducted extensive polling on what NASA’s goal should be and then implement a “policy by committee compromise”. Luckily he instead showed a trait that is lacking in the people/party that opposes him at every turn, leadership.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just how many government policies are devised from their very inception fully in the public arena? I suspect some would rather Bush would have conducted extensive polling on what NASA’s goal should be and then implement a “policy by committee compromise”. Luckily he instead showed a trait that is lacking in the people/party that opposes him at every turn, leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
