http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/12/02/americans-for-space/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=americans-for-space Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/12/02/americans-for-space/#comment-2133 Tue, 07 Dec 2004 02:40:58 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=373#comment-2133 My POV is that of O’Neill & Heppenheimer, using the early Heppenheimer writings (“Colonies in Space”, “Toward Distant Suns”, and his commentary in the 1977 Co-Evolution Quarterly on Space Colonization) for starters. Further, I join with those who wish to emigrate to the Moon, permamently. An heart which would fail on Earth’s gravity would still be functional in 1/6th Gravity, that of the Moon. And that is for starters.

]]> http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/12/02/americans-for-space/#comment-2132 Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:15:03 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=373#comment-2132 My bet would be on O’Neillians. By the way I’m an O’Neillian, I even have an autograph book by him.

]]> http://www.spacepolitics.com/2004/12/02/americans-for-space/#comment-2131 Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:03:01 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=373#comment-2131 I wonder if “Americans for Space” will prove to be oriented towards: (1) Saganauts; (2) von Braunians or (3) O’Neillians?

]]>