Comments on: House Hubble hearing http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/01/31/house-hubble-hearing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=house-hubble-hearing Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 By: MrEarl http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/01/31/house-hubble-hearing/#comment-2420 Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:01:17 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=424#comment-2420 From this hearing the astronomical community at Hopkins seems to come to the conclusion that building a new Hubble with the repacement equiptment is the bet way to go. Seems we heard of this option on the space blogs for almost a year now!

]]> By: Dogsbd http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/01/31/house-hubble-hearing/#comment-2419 Tue, 01 Feb 2005 12:36:23 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=424#comment-2419 Yeah, looks like the panel is stacked in favor of Hubble. I wonder whos’ idea that was?

]]> By: Jim http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/01/31/house-hubble-hearing/#comment-2418 Tue, 01 Feb 2005 07:36:25 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=424#comment-2418 Most of the invited people are Hubble and astronomy experts.

It would be logical to also invite experts on the shuttle (eg. CAIB) and robotics, since these are the options for servicing Hubble.

]]>