<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mr. Rutan goes to Washington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/04/21/mr-rutan-goes-to-washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/04/21/mr-rutan-goes-to-washington/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mr-rutan-goes-to-washington</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goff</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/04/21/mr-rutan-goes-to-washington/#comment-2774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Goff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=521#comment-2774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Randall,

Ah, that makes sense now. You guys didn&#039;t announce
it on your site till several days later, and the 
announcement was worded such that it made it appear
as though you hadn&#039;t been declared sufficiently
complete till November 10th.  I had remembered it
being the last day at Space Access, but when Sam
Dinkin mentioned the dates, it made me second guess
my memory.  Cool, as I said though, it only more
thoroughly makes my point.

~Jon
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randall,</p>
<p>Ah, that makes sense now. You guys didn&#8217;t announce<br />
it on your site till several days later, and the<br />
announcement was worded such that it made it appear<br />
as though you hadn&#8217;t been declared sufficiently<br />
complete till November 10th.  I had remembered it<br />
being the last day at Space Access, but when Sam<br />
Dinkin mentioned the dates, it made me second guess<br />
my memory.  Cool, as I said though, it only more<br />
thoroughly makes my point.</p>
<p>~Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall Clague</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/04/21/mr-rutan-goes-to-washington/#comment-2773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Clague]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 02:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=521#comment-2773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon,

The &quot;sufficiently complete&quot; letter from AST is dated 10/29/2003, and says they logged our application into their licensing system on 10/27/2003.

-R]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>The &#8220;sufficiently complete&#8221; letter from AST is dated 10/29/2003, and says they logged our application into their licensing system on 10/27/2003.</p>
<p>-R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goff</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/04/21/mr-rutan-goes-to-washington/#comment-2772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Goff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 06:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=521#comment-2772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff,

That&#039;s what I thought I remembered.  But am I 
doing my math wrong or getting the dates wrong?  
Unless I&#039;m screwing up somwhere isn&#039;t April 23,
2004 less than 180 days after Nov 10, 2003.

That said, your info makes the point all the more 
clear that Rutan&#039;s accusation that AST was wasting
time on XCOR&#039;s license that could have been spent
on Scaled&#039;s is just silly.  Had he actually tried
working with the AST even slightly in advance, he
could have avoided any schedule delays and cost 
overruns.  I&#039;d love to see the AST launch license
process streamlined a bunch more (cause MSS is
going to be running that gauntlet in the next year
or so hopefully), and hopefully the provisions in 
the new Commercial Space Launch bill that was 
passed last year for Experimental Licenses will 
help.  We&#039;ll have to see, no?

~Jon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I thought I remembered.  But am I<br />
doing my math wrong or getting the dates wrong?<br />
Unless I&#8217;m screwing up somwhere isn&#8217;t April 23,<br />
2004 less than 180 days after Nov 10, 2003.</p>
<p>That said, your info makes the point all the more<br />
clear that Rutan&#8217;s accusation that AST was wasting<br />
time on XCOR&#8217;s license that could have been spent<br />
on Scaled&#8217;s is just silly.  Had he actually tried<br />
working with the AST even slightly in advance, he<br />
could have avoided any schedule delays and cost<br />
overruns.  I&#8217;d love to see the AST launch license<br />
process streamlined a bunch more (cause MSS is<br />
going to be running that gauntlet in the next year<br />
or so hopefully), and hopefully the provisions in<br />
the new Commercial Space Launch bill that was<br />
passed last year for Experimental Licenses will<br />
help.  We&#8217;ll have to see, no?</p>
<p>~Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falco</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/04/21/mr-rutan-goes-to-washington/#comment-2771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Falco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 00:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=521#comment-2771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m kinda disappointed that the committee didn&#039;t address Rutan&#039;s concerns more.  While it does seem that Rutan has had his feather&#039;s ruffled a little by AST, he&#039;s still right, and he still has a perfect record behind him, which means something.

And I can&#039;t for the life of me get a recording of the meeting.  CSPAN isn&#039;t showing it, and I can&#039;t get the webcasts to run.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kinda disappointed that the committee didn&#8217;t address Rutan&#8217;s concerns more.  While it does seem that Rutan has had his feather&#8217;s ruffled a little by AST, he&#8217;s still right, and he still has a perfect record behind him, which means something.</p>
<p>And I can&#8217;t for the life of me get a recording of the meeting.  CSPAN isn&#8217;t showing it, and I can&#8217;t get the webcasts to run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Greason</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/04/21/mr-rutan-goes-to-washington/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Greason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=521#comment-2770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One correction; AST delivered our license exactly 180 days after documenting it as &quot;substantially complete&quot; -- at the last legally permissable instant, not &quot;with a couple of weeks to spare&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One correction; AST delivered our license exactly 180 days after documenting it as &#8220;substantially complete&#8221; &#8212; at the last legally permissable instant, not &#8220;with a couple of weeks to spare&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goff</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/04/21/mr-rutan-goes-to-washington/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Goff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=521#comment-2769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sam,

Yeah, AST backburnered them while they were working on SS1&#039;s license, and only got back to XCOR&#039;s application sometime in early April 2004, IIRC.

~Jon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>Yeah, AST backburnered them while they were working on SS1&#8217;s license, and only got back to XCOR&#8217;s application sometime in early April 2004, IIRC.</p>
<p>~Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Dinkin</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/04/21/mr-rutan-goes-to-washington/#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Dinkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=521#comment-2768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AST did not exactly rush to get XCOR&#039;s license approved. XCOR had their application substantially complete on November 10. AST was statutorially required to go yea or nay on the XCOR application within 180 days which they satisfied with only a couple of weeks to spare on April 23.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AST did not exactly rush to get XCOR&#8217;s license approved. XCOR had their application substantially complete on November 10. AST was statutorially required to go yea or nay on the XCOR application within 180 days which they satisfied with only a couple of weeks to spare on April 23.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goff</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/04/21/mr-rutan-goes-to-washington/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Goff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=521#comment-2767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff,

While I respect Rutan&#039;s accomplishments a lot, his quote is quite misleading.  When Rutan finally got his act together and decided to get a launch license, AST more or less completely sidelined XCOR&#039;s work until they were done with Rutan&#039;s, specifically because Rutan had flyable hardware.  XCOR&#039;s work on getting a launch license in no way (to my knowledge) impeded or slowed down Scaled&#039;s launch license application.  Burt basically drug his feet and tried getting around the launch license requirement until he finally realized that the government really wasn&#039;t going to let him fly unless he got one.  Then he descended on AST and pushed his application through.  When that happened, AST had to pull pretty much all of its people off of the XCOR license and throw them at Burt&#039;s license.  Had he actually tried in even the slightest manner to work with the AST in advance, he would have had a much better time.  In fact, I&#039;m willing to bet that XCOR&#039;s pioneering work in the area actually helped speed up their application, not slow it down.

~Jon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>While I respect Rutan&#8217;s accomplishments a lot, his quote is quite misleading.  When Rutan finally got his act together and decided to get a launch license, AST more or less completely sidelined XCOR&#8217;s work until they were done with Rutan&#8217;s, specifically because Rutan had flyable hardware.  XCOR&#8217;s work on getting a launch license in no way (to my knowledge) impeded or slowed down Scaled&#8217;s launch license application.  Burt basically drug his feet and tried getting around the launch license requirement until he finally realized that the government really wasn&#8217;t going to let him fly unless he got one.  Then he descended on AST and pushed his application through.  When that happened, AST had to pull pretty much all of its people off of the XCOR license and throw them at Burt&#8217;s license.  Had he actually tried in even the slightest manner to work with the AST in advance, he would have had a much better time.  In fact, I&#8217;m willing to bet that XCOR&#8217;s pioneering work in the area actually helped speed up their application, not slow it down.</p>
<p>~Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
