<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House subcommittee supports NASA, but&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/05/25/house-subcommittee-supports-nasa-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/05/25/house-subcommittee-supports-nasa-but/</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:57:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/05/25/house-subcommittee-supports-nasa-but/comment-page-1/#comment-3129</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 19:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=557#comment-3129</guid>
		<description>Unfortunatly its not likely all the cuts will be from future research. Hutchinson would be against it as part of the &quot;national LAb&quot; desgination she wants for the space station. So who looses out and do they get a gain? Johnson is the main looser as IIRC they do the effects of long duration spaceflight research, but they do gain a lot in other programs. 

Science programs gained but also lost? I just do not see it. Maybe its congrees talk for gains when there really wasn&#039;t much of one. 

With the talk of troubles with the JWST that may be a casulty. Which long term i don&#039;t mind too much as if we get cheaper launch capibilities, we may still have it up with a small delay and at full compacity at same or lower cost.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunatly its not likely all the cuts will be from future research. Hutchinson would be against it as part of the &#8220;national LAb&#8221; desgination she wants for the space station. So who looses out and do they get a gain? Johnson is the main looser as IIRC they do the effects of long duration spaceflight research, but they do gain a lot in other programs. </p>
<p>Science programs gained but also lost? I just do not see it. Maybe its congrees talk for gains when there really wasn&#8217;t much of one. </p>
<p>With the talk of troubles with the JWST that may be a casulty. Which long term i don&#8217;t mind too much as if we get cheaper launch capibilities, we may still have it up with a small delay and at full compacity at same or lower cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Schrimpsher: Space Pragmatism Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/05/25/house-subcommittee-supports-nasa-but/comment-page-1/#comment-3128</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Schrimpsher: Space Pragmatism Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 14:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=557#comment-3128</guid>
		<description>Wow, I agree with Greg!  That is a suprise....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I agree with Greg!  That is a suprise&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Kuperberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/05/25/house-subcommittee-supports-nasa-but/comment-page-1/#comment-3127</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Kuperberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 12:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=557#comment-3127</guid>
		<description>The cuts can come from the one category that can easily give up funds:  Future research onboard the space station.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cuts can come from the one category that can easily give up funds:  Future research onboard the space station.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cIclops</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/05/25/house-subcommittee-supports-nasa-but/comment-page-1/#comment-3126</link>
		<dc:creator>cIclops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 11:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=557#comment-3126</guid>
		<description>Good news apparently. How much influence did Griffin have in shaping this budget?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news apparently. How much influence did Griffin have in shaping this budget?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

