<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House budget debate continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/06/16/house-budget-debate-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/06/16/house-budget-debate-continues/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=house-budget-debate-continues</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Kuperberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/06/16/house-budget-debate-continues/#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Kuperberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=577#comment-3288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Against the backdrop of a failing $40 billion space station, Chocola&#039;s tactic is a cynical and pathetic exercise in penny wisdom and grand foolishness.  It&#039;s like a car salesman who overcharges you $10,000 for an utterly impractical SUV, and steals your credit card number; but gives you a double refund when your quarter jams in his vending machine to show you how fair he is.

On the other hand, Laurie Anderson doesn&#039;t impress me and I really don&#039;t care whether NASA uses her for outreach.  In fact, I think that NASA&#039;s outreach in general is overfunded and sometimes dishonest.  I note that some other people here think that NASA should do more outreach.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Against the backdrop of a failing $40 billion space station, Chocola&#8217;s tactic is a cynical and pathetic exercise in penny wisdom and grand foolishness.  It&#8217;s like a car salesman who overcharges you $10,000 for an utterly impractical SUV, and steals your credit card number; but gives you a double refund when your quarter jams in his vending machine to show you how fair he is.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Laurie Anderson doesn&#8217;t impress me and I really don&#8217;t care whether NASA uses her for outreach.  In fact, I think that NASA&#8217;s outreach in general is overfunded and sometimes dishonest.  I note that some other people here think that NASA should do more outreach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/06/16/house-budget-debate-continues/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=577#comment-3287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great.  So they&#039;ll just give the &quot;artist in residence&quot; a different title.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great.  So they&#8217;ll just give the &#8220;artist in residence&#8221; a different title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
