<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An unusual hearing on space weapons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/09/13/an-unusual-hearing-on-space-weapons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/09/13/an-unusual-hearing-on-space-weapons/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=an-unusual-hearing-on-space-weapons</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Parkin</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/09/13/an-unusual-hearing-on-space-weapons/#comment-4797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Parkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=652#comment-4797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The name of the hearing itself &quot;Parliamentary Hearing on Space Security&quot; raises an important point:  The rest of the world labels this basket of issues &quot;space security&quot; whereas the US labels it &quot;space weapons&quot;. 

The trouble is &quot;space weapons&quot; has connotations of Star Wars type scenarios that are not the intent of the US.  &quot;space security&quot; is a better descriptor for what DOD presently wants and the name is much less of a liability.  DOD should change their terminology unless they specifically want to induce hearings, deliberations and preemptive thinking about &quot;space weapons&quot; around the world while not actually pursuing them.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name of the hearing itself &#8220;Parliamentary Hearing on Space Security&#8221; raises an important point:  The rest of the world labels this basket of issues &#8220;space security&#8221; whereas the US labels it &#8220;space weapons&#8221;. </p>
<p>The trouble is &#8220;space weapons&#8221; has connotations of Star Wars type scenarios that are not the intent of the US.  &#8220;space security&#8221; is a better descriptor for what DOD presently wants and the name is much less of a liability.  DOD should change their terminology unless they specifically want to induce hearings, deliberations and preemptive thinking about &#8220;space weapons&#8221; around the world while not actually pursuing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
