<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Problems ahead for ULA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/09/13/problems-ahead-for-ula/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/09/13/problems-ahead-for-ula/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=problems-ahead-for-ula</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Davenport</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/09/13/problems-ahead-for-ula/#comment-4775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Davenport]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=650#comment-4775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt; When it was announced in early May, the United Launch Alliance (ULA), the Boeing-Lockheed Martin joint venture to build EELVs, looked like it would win wide acceptance from the government. ... &lt;/i&gt;

Issues: The Atlas V and the Delta IV are extremely similar, except that they can&#039;t share the same launch tower. ( Or could they? )  Why not down select to just one?

Reply: Keep both missiles alive to avoid dependence on one vender.

Reply to that: Why not choose the best of the two missiles, and second-source manufacturing of the better missile to the loser of the Atlas-Delta downselection? 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> When it was announced in early May, the United Launch Alliance (ULA), the Boeing-Lockheed Martin joint venture to build EELVs, looked like it would win wide acceptance from the government. &#8230; </i></p>
<p>Issues: The Atlas V and the Delta IV are extremely similar, except that they can&#8217;t share the same launch tower. ( Or could they? )  Why not down select to just one?</p>
<p>Reply: Keep both missiles alive to avoid dependence on one vender.</p>
<p>Reply to that: Why not choose the best of the two missiles, and second-source manufacturing of the better missile to the loser of the Atlas-Delta downselection? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
