<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dale confirmation hearing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/10/31/dale-confirmation-hearing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/10/31/dale-confirmation-hearing/</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Dinkin</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/10/31/dale-confirmation-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-6003</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Dinkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=704#comment-6003</guid>
		<description>X-15 was $300 million in 1961 dollars so it is still more expensive than SS1 by a factor of ten. Inflation makes it a factor of 30.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X-15 was $300 million in 1961 dollars so it is still more expensive than SS1 by a factor of ten. Inflation makes it a factor of 30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/10/31/dale-confirmation-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-6002</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald F. Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 22:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=704#comment-6002</guid>
		<description>My point was, and still is, that I believe Mr. Kendall drastically underestimated what NASA has spent on automated Mars missions.  If so, that makes his arguments that much stronger.  

-- Donald</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point was, and still is, that I believe Mr. Kendall drastically underestimated what NASA has spent on automated Mars missions.  If so, that makes his arguments that much stronger.  </p>
<p>&#8211; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Davenport</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/10/31/dale-confirmation-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-6001</link>
		<dc:creator>David Davenport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 21:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=704#comment-6001</guid>
		<description>Donald, one can play all sorts of games comparing the buying power of present dollars to the value of the dollar in some past year.

For example, Mr. Rutan&#039;s SS1 project is reported to have cost $25M. I could go find twenty five houses and lots that sold for about $1M each this year, real estate that orginally sold for less than $100K each when new in 1961. Same lots, pretty much the same house. Then I can deduce that  Spaceship One cost about $250K in 1961 dollars, cheaper even than X-15, so there.

Conversely, using the same comparative buying power logic, one could make Saturn/Apollo seem ruinously expensive. 

I suppose the same goes for Viking. What is your point, really?

Let me remind you, buddy, that John Henry tried and tried, but he died short of the steam drill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald, one can play all sorts of games comparing the buying power of present dollars to the value of the dollar in some past year.</p>
<p>For example, Mr. Rutan&#8217;s SS1 project is reported to have cost $25M. I could go find twenty five houses and lots that sold for about $1M each this year, real estate that orginally sold for less than $100K each when new in 1961. Same lots, pretty much the same house. Then I can deduce that  Spaceship One cost about $250K in 1961 dollars, cheaper even than X-15, so there.</p>
<p>Conversely, using the same comparative buying power logic, one could make Saturn/Apollo seem ruinously expensive. </p>
<p>I suppose the same goes for Viking. What is your point, really?</p>
<p>Let me remind you, buddy, that John Henry tried and tried, but he died short of the steam drill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/10/31/dale-confirmation-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald F. Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=704#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t.  However, contrary to usual practice, Jeff did not start a thread dealing with the new issue of &lt;i&gt;The Space Review&lt;/i&gt;, so if I was going to comment on it here was where it had to be.

-- Donald</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t.  However, contrary to usual practice, Jeff did not start a thread dealing with the new issue of <i>The Space Review</i>, so if I was going to comment on it here was where it had to be.</p>
<p>&#8211; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/10/31/dale-confirmation-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-5999</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=704#comment-5999</guid>
		<description>Donald,

How does the above relate to the Dale hearings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald,</p>
<p>How does the above relate to the Dale hearings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/10/31/dale-confirmation-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-5998</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald F. Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=704#comment-5998</guid>
		<description>Regarding Anthony Kendall&#039;s excellent article, I&#039;m glad to see I&#039;m not the only one shouting into the automated wilderness. . . .

However, &lt;i&gt;in 2003 dollars, the total cost of all NASA-led surface-landing Mars missions to date is somewhere near $4.2 billion.&lt;/i&gt;

It was my understanding that Viking alone cost something like $5 billion in current-year dollars (circa $1 billion at the time).  Am I wrong?

-- Donald</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Anthony Kendall&#8217;s excellent article, I&#8217;m glad to see I&#8217;m not the only one shouting into the automated wilderness. . . .</p>
<p>However, <i>in 2003 dollars, the total cost of all NASA-led surface-landing Mars missions to date is somewhere near $4.2 billion.</i></p>
<p>It was my understanding that Viking alone cost something like $5 billion in current-year dollars (circa $1 billion at the time).  Am I wrong?</p>
<p>&#8211; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

