Comments on: NPOESS hearing http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/11/15/npoess-hearing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=npoess-hearing Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 By: Kamurangous http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/11/15/npoess-hearing/#comment-6140 Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:01:26 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=719#comment-6140 All is great guys, but I belive vortelucius is much better.

]]> By: AJ Mackenzie http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/11/15/npoess-hearing/#comment-6139 Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:42:46 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=719#comment-6139 I recall reading a couple weeks ago (in Space News?) that there was a move afoot among the various agencies involved with this program to remove the Landsat imager and put it on a dedicated spacecraft, so maybe there’s still hope…

]]> By: Ryan Zelnio http://www.spacepolitics.com/2005/11/15/npoess-hearing/#comment-6138 Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:07:08 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=719#comment-6138 I am very interested to hear the outcome of this hearing.

As someone who is a firm believer in the need for Landsat data to continue, I am upset that they merged the Landsat imager onto the NPOESS program to be launched on C-1. I hope that as a result of all of this, that Landsat is divorced from NPOESS and is flown as a seperate mission that maintains the excellent data that we have recieved over the past 30+ years.

]]>