<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More humans-vs-robots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=more-humans-vs-robots</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/#comment-6641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=797#comment-6641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great list, Ken.  I&#039;m copying this to my desktop for potential future use (with credit, of course).  

I would add asteroid mining and trade in lunar oxygen for use in space as at least potential near-term benefits.  

Also, in my opinion, your numbers four and five collectively are the single most important reason for human spaceflight.  While we are rapidly converting ourselves to a mono-culture, mono-economy, and mono-political ideology down here, variety in all of these spheres is critical for the long-term survival of our species.  In the future, that will only be possible out in the Solar System.

-- Donald

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list, Ken.  I&#8217;m copying this to my desktop for potential future use (with credit, of course).  </p>
<p>I would add asteroid mining and trade in lunar oxygen for use in space as at least potential near-term benefits.  </p>
<p>Also, in my opinion, your numbers four and five collectively are the single most important reason for human spaceflight.  While we are rapidly converting ourselves to a mono-culture, mono-economy, and mono-political ideology down here, variety in all of these spheres is critical for the long-term survival of our species.  In the future, that will only be possible out in the Solar System.</p>
<p>&#8212; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/#comment-6640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken murphy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=797#comment-6640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh golly, there&#039;s so many examples David it&#039;s hard to know where to begin.  Let&#039;s see, open up new possibilities to solve problems on this planet...

1) Advances in CELSS technology will help to advnace the state of the art in things like recycling and work environment management systems.

2) Tapping a 4.5 billion year power supply doesn&#039;t need much explanation.

3) Materials science advances from alloys to ceramics to glasses can have all kinds of benefits down here on Earth.

4) Small settlements allow for unique experiments in governance in a &#039;controlled&#039; setting.

5) Small settlements also allow for the creation of micro-cultures that evolve different societal values and mores, as well as arts, music, literature, other muses.  Definitely a plus for civilization.

6) New industries that none of us here can envision will develop.  I&#039;m personally curious about the optical qualities of the anhydrous glass on the Moon.  Can we have better and lighter eyeglasses as a result?  Who knows?

7) I want to make vacuum spheres (a) for a commercial audience but more importantly (b) for the academic and (c) industrial markets.  How cool would be a meter long cylinder with scale models of a hammer and feather inside?  Schools would eat that up.  What could private industry do with a 6m^3 volume of hard vacuum for an inexpensive price?

8) Greater operational security could be ensured by having orbital crews making regular runs to GEO or HEO.  This capacity would also enable larger, more powerful arrays that could ensure that DISH customers never get rained out.

9) I&#039;d consider asteroids to be one of the low-probability problems that needs to be solved, and having the kind of robust space-based assets necessary to support settlement would also enable some capability to address the problem.  I&#039;d be happy if we just got a sunward-looking NEO scope up at EML-1 for starters.

10) Experimenting with crops in micro and partial gravity may allow greater insight into their biological functioning, which could be of benefit in agricultural applications.

Shall I continue?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh golly, there&#8217;s so many examples David it&#8217;s hard to know where to begin.  Let&#8217;s see, open up new possibilities to solve problems on this planet&#8230;</p>
<p>1) Advances in CELSS technology will help to advnace the state of the art in things like recycling and work environment management systems.</p>
<p>2) Tapping a 4.5 billion year power supply doesn&#8217;t need much explanation.</p>
<p>3) Materials science advances from alloys to ceramics to glasses can have all kinds of benefits down here on Earth.</p>
<p>4) Small settlements allow for unique experiments in governance in a &#8216;controlled&#8217; setting.</p>
<p>5) Small settlements also allow for the creation of micro-cultures that evolve different societal values and mores, as well as arts, music, literature, other muses.  Definitely a plus for civilization.</p>
<p>6) New industries that none of us here can envision will develop.  I&#8217;m personally curious about the optical qualities of the anhydrous glass on the Moon.  Can we have better and lighter eyeglasses as a result?  Who knows?</p>
<p>7) I want to make vacuum spheres (a) for a commercial audience but more importantly (b) for the academic and (c) industrial markets.  How cool would be a meter long cylinder with scale models of a hammer and feather inside?  Schools would eat that up.  What could private industry do with a 6m^3 volume of hard vacuum for an inexpensive price?</p>
<p>8) Greater operational security could be ensured by having orbital crews making regular runs to GEO or HEO.  This capacity would also enable larger, more powerful arrays that could ensure that DISH customers never get rained out.</p>
<p>9) I&#8217;d consider asteroids to be one of the low-probability problems that needs to be solved, and having the kind of robust space-based assets necessary to support settlement would also enable some capability to address the problem.  I&#8217;d be happy if we just got a sunward-looking NEO scope up at EML-1 for starters.</p>
<p>10) Experimenting with crops in micro and partial gravity may allow greater insight into their biological functioning, which could be of benefit in agricultural applications.</p>
<p>Shall I continue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Davenport</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/#comment-6639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Davenport]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=797#comment-6639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt; The simple fact is, if we gave a sustained effort at colonization, we open up so many possiblities to solve our problems on this planet. &lt;/i&gt;

How? Please explain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> The simple fact is, if we gave a sustained effort at colonization, we open up so many possiblities to solve our problems on this planet. </i></p>
<p>How? Please explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferris Valyn</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/#comment-6638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferris Valyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=797#comment-6638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David, I suspect your comment mighta been tongue in cheek, but if it wasn&#039;t, and you do support manned flight, I really suggest you re-examine your thoughts and arguements - the only reason to support a sustain human presence in space is space colonization.  Otherwise, I think we should just use robotic missions.  be a lot simplier and cheaper, and safer in the long run

On the other hand, if you understand the reasons for space colonization, you see that we&#039;ll need experince with humans in space.  The simple fact is, if we gave a sustained effort at colonization, we open up so many possiblities to solve our problems on this planet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I suspect your comment mighta been tongue in cheek, but if it wasn&#8217;t, and you do support manned flight, I really suggest you re-examine your thoughts and arguements &#8211; the only reason to support a sustain human presence in space is space colonization.  Otherwise, I think we should just use robotic missions.  be a lot simplier and cheaper, and safer in the long run</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you understand the reasons for space colonization, you see that we&#8217;ll need experince with humans in space.  The simple fact is, if we gave a sustained effort at colonization, we open up so many possiblities to solve our problems on this planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Lee Elifritz</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/#comment-6637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Lee Elifritz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=797#comment-6637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, it&#039;s just insane. Horseless carriages, flying machines, moon rockets, personal computers.

Yes, space colonization is total nonsense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, it&#8217;s just insane. Horseless carriages, flying machines, moon rockets, personal computers.</p>
<p>Yes, space colonization is total nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Davenport</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/#comment-6636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Davenport]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=797#comment-6636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt; Even if they look at us like we are crazy. &lt;/i&gt;

You are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Even if they look at us like we are crazy. </i></p>
<p>You are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Lee Elifritz</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/#comment-6635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Lee Elifritz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=797#comment-6635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will. To think that these liberal commie scientists would build liberal commie robots to bring liberal commie comet stuff back to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for God&#039;s sake! It&#039;s just blasphemous!

Seriously though, we&#039;ll just have to wait it out and pick up the pieces when it&#039;s all over. The SCHTICK is going nowhere, we&#039;ll have pictures of Pluto before we land a man on the moon. Oops, I forgot, we already landed a man on the moon, didn&#039;t we.

I&#039;m just waiting around for the whole shebang to collapse, so that private industry can build a  space colonization friendly SSTO/RLV out of the remaining SSMEs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will. To think that these liberal commie scientists would build liberal commie robots to bring liberal commie comet stuff back to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for God&#8217;s sake! It&#8217;s just blasphemous!</p>
<p>Seriously though, we&#8217;ll just have to wait it out and pick up the pieces when it&#8217;s all over. The SCHTICK is going nowhere, we&#8217;ll have pictures of Pluto before we land a man on the moon. Oops, I forgot, we already landed a man on the moon, didn&#8217;t we.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just waiting around for the whole shebang to collapse, so that private industry can build a  space colonization friendly SSTO/RLV out of the remaining SSMEs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferris Valyn</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/#comment-6634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferris Valyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=797#comment-6634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, some of us (infact, anyone who has legemitly analyzed it) would argue that the MSM, or traditional media, have gone off the deep end to support the extreme Right.  But, be that as it may, and I honestly don&#039;t want to drag this into a debate about the leanings of the media, I reiterate - we need to start talking about Space Colonization, any time anyone starts asking why we are talking about manned flights.  Its just that simple.   Even if they look at us like we are crazy.  (I could make a comment here, but I won&#039;t)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, some of us (infact, anyone who has legemitly analyzed it) would argue that the MSM, or traditional media, have gone off the deep end to support the extreme Right.  But, be that as it may, and I honestly don&#8217;t want to drag this into a debate about the leanings of the media, I reiterate &#8211; we need to start talking about Space Colonization, any time anyone starts asking why we are talking about manned flights.  Its just that simple.   Even if they look at us like we are crazy.  (I could make a comment here, but I won&#8217;t)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Puckett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/#comment-6633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Puckett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=797#comment-6633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Yes, Mike, liberal commie robots, they are everywhere.&quot;

Still buiding strawmen and not rockets I see there Thomas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yes, Mike, liberal commie robots, they are everywhere.&#8221;</p>
<p>Still buiding strawmen and not rockets I see there Thomas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Puckett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/01/18/more-humans-vs-robots/#comment-6632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Puckett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=797#comment-6632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Mike: Either you&#039;re against big government or you aren&#039;t. It is quite clear from Tom DeLay&#039;s statements that the VSE is big government patronage &amp;mdash DeLay hardly even tries to hide it. (To be sure, DeLay mostly wants shuttle and station money, because there is more of it than CEV money, but he lumps it all together as the VSE.) It is exactly the sort of &quot;vote buying welfare&quot; that you profess to be against.&quot;

And you are trying to laud the &#039;MSM&#039; for advocation cutting manned spaceflight as equalling &#039;not big government&#039; when they are merely robbing Peter to pay Paul.

If my tax dollars must be confiscated, let it be on something with a sliver of a chance of advancing human spaceflight.  Not pretty pictures for a handfull clique of astronomers or welfare spending that reinforces negative work ethics and dependancies on government by large numbers or our population.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mike: Either you&#8217;re against big government or you aren&#8217;t. It is quite clear from Tom DeLay&#8217;s statements that the VSE is big government patronage &#038;mdash DeLay hardly even tries to hide it. (To be sure, DeLay mostly wants shuttle and station money, because there is more of it than CEV money, but he lumps it all together as the VSE.) It is exactly the sort of &#8220;vote buying welfare&#8221; that you profess to be against.&#8221;</p>
<p>And you are trying to laud the &#8216;MSM&#8217; for advocation cutting manned spaceflight as equalling &#8216;not big government&#8217; when they are merely robbing Peter to pay Paul.</p>
<p>If my tax dollars must be confiscated, let it be on something with a sliver of a chance of advancing human spaceflight.  Not pretty pictures for a handfull clique of astronomers or welfare spending that reinforces negative work ethics and dependancies on government by large numbers or our population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
