<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientists are from Mars, remote sensing advocates are from Earth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/02/15/scientists-are-from-mars-remote-sensing-advocates-are-from-earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/02/15/scientists-are-from-mars-remote-sensing-advocates-are-from-earth/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=scientists-are-from-mars-remote-sensing-advocates-are-from-earth</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/02/15/scientists-are-from-mars-remote-sensing-advocates-are-from-earth/#comment-6993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=846#comment-6993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can see very good reasons for keeping the Landsat record going, but I agree that it should belong to the USGS or NOAA (or even a military service before NASA).  Also, I can think of no reason today why 30m to 10m multispectral imaging should cost what Landsat costs; this should be an inexpensive smallsat product.  If so, it could probably be commercialized.

-- Donald

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see very good reasons for keeping the Landsat record going, but I agree that it should belong to the USGS or NOAA (or even a military service before NASA).  Also, I can think of no reason today why 30m to 10m multispectral imaging should cost what Landsat costs; this should be an inexpensive smallsat product.  If so, it could probably be commercialized.</p>
<p>&#8212; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Puckett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/02/15/scientists-are-from-mars-remote-sensing-advocates-are-from-earth/#comment-6992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Puckett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=846#comment-6992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why should remote sensing remain a function of NASA?  Why not NOAA or USGS?  These are not the bleeding edge fields they once were.

Better yet, why not just buy data from the private sector and make governement a customer?  I cannot see why other than for national security purposes, the governemnt should remain anything but a consumer of private remote sensing services.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should remote sensing remain a function of NASA?  Why not NOAA or USGS?  These are not the bleeding edge fields they once were.</p>
<p>Better yet, why not just buy data from the private sector and make governement a customer?  I cannot see why other than for national security purposes, the governemnt should remain anything but a consumer of private remote sensing services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/02/15/scientists-are-from-mars-remote-sensing-advocates-are-from-earth/#comment-6991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=846#comment-6991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, it&#039;s the wrong one.  More people live in the United States than Antarctica, yet we still spend lots of money sending scientists to study the latter.  

-- Donald]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, it&#8217;s the wrong one.  More people live in the United States than Antarctica, yet we still spend lots of money sending scientists to study the latter.  </p>
<p>&#8212; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Kuperberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/02/15/scientists-are-from-mars-remote-sensing-advocates-are-from-earth/#comment-6990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Kuperberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=846#comment-6990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Udall has a point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Udall has a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
