Comments on: ProSpace response to Wired News article http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/03/03/prospace-response-to-wired-news-article/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=prospace-response-to-wired-news-article Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 By: andre http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/03/03/prospace-response-to-wired-news-article/#comment-7165 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:37:32 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=871#comment-7165 What a great site. Thanks

]]> By: Rand Simberg http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/03/03/prospace-response-to-wired-news-article/#comment-7164 Sun, 05 Mar 2006 02:47:25 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=871#comment-7164 You know, I’ve read the “revised” version of the article, and other than the (slight) correction of March Storm’s nature, it’s just as clueless. It continues to make Bruce Gagnon’s idiotic fantasies prominent. I remain unimpressed.

]]> By: Dwayne A. Day http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/03/03/prospace-response-to-wired-news-article/#comment-7163 Fri, 03 Mar 2006 22:16:32 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=871#comment-7163 I originally sent “feedback” to the writer. However, I did not realize that they post feedback to their website. If I had realized that, I would have been a little more, er, circumspect.

]]> By: Michael Mealling http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/03/03/prospace-response-to-wired-news-article/#comment-7162 Fri, 03 Mar 2006 21:07:14 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=871#comment-7162 Dwayne,
I just did that. The interface is a bit wonky but it appears to have been posted….

]]> By: kert http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/03/03/prospace-response-to-wired-news-article/#comment-7161 Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:32:20 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=871#comment-7161 tis america. sue the guy for slander or something

]]> By: Donald F. Robertson http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/03/03/prospace-response-to-wired-news-article/#comment-7160 Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:31:41 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=871#comment-7160 Mr. Day, again, please be aware that Wired and Wired News are now two separate organizations (though you can still reach one’s Web site from the other). Responding to Wired about a Wired News report probably is not very useful.

— Donald

]]> By: Dwayne A. Day http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/03/03/prospace-response-to-wired-news-article/#comment-7159 Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:28:39 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=871#comment-7159 Hopefully, Schlather will follow that letter up with a phone call. The difficult thing will be rising above the usual level of noise and complaints that most editors receive constantly in order for them to take you seriously. One big problem with incorrect articles posted to the web is that they get repeated and cited by others. So ProSpace has to be active about this, or other people will cite that article in the future.

The original Wired webpage appears to allow comments if you register. So far, nobody has bothered to post a comment there about the inaccuracy of the story. At the very least, all of the ProSpace participants should consider posting polite replies stating that the article is inaccurate.

It might be useful to make Wired’s editors think twice before they hire this reporter for another story.

]]> By: Rand Simberg http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/03/03/prospace-response-to-wired-news-article/#comment-7158 Fri, 03 Mar 2006 14:56:27 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=871#comment-7158 OK, I was wrong. It wasn’t just ignorance. Sounds like a political agenda at work. Any credibility this reporter has had in the past should be considered evaporated at this point.

]]>