<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times takes aim at earmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/05/01/new-york-times-takes-aim-at-earmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/05/01/new-york-times-takes-aim-at-earmarks/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-york-times-takes-aim-at-earmarks</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Card</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/05/01/new-york-times-takes-aim-at-earmarks/#comment-7823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Card]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 09:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=959#comment-7823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since there is effectively zero threat of a Presidential veto one can have NO doubts about the (non-existent) self-restraint of this Congress to ear-marking. The only other method left to combat this practice is shedding the light of day on offenders--for example, include the actual earmarks in your post along with the name of the sponsor. Unfortunately, ear-marking has become so common it is questionable whether the members even consider it something of which to be ashamed. 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since there is effectively zero threat of a Presidential veto one can have NO doubts about the (non-existent) self-restraint of this Congress to ear-marking. The only other method left to combat this practice is shedding the light of day on offenders&#8211;for example, include the actual earmarks in your post along with the name of the sponsor. Unfortunately, ear-marking has become so common it is questionable whether the members even consider it something of which to be ashamed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
