Comments on: Pluto and politics http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/08/30/pluto-and-politics/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pluto-and-politics Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 By: Nemo http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/08/30/pluto-and-politics/#comment-8736 Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:01:27 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=1083#comment-8736 The entire HR is crap, and terribly written. I feel bad for the author and those who believe in it.

Dude, I feel bad for you taking this seriously. Jeff already indicated the HR was written tongue-in-cheek.

]]> By: Eric Conrad http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/08/30/pluto-and-politics/#comment-8735 Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:51:00 +0000 http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=1083#comment-8735 This is incredible. They are actually claiming psychological harm to the people of California? They’re saying, “Downgrading Pluto’s status will cause psychological harm to some Californians who question their place in the universe and
worry about the instability of universal constants”! Also, “The downgrading of Pluto reduces the number of planets available for legislative leaders to hide redistricting legislation and other inconvenient political reform measures”

The entire HR is crap, and terribly written. I feel bad for the author and those who believe in it.

]]>