<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sensenbrenner to return to House Science Committee?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/12/02/sensenbrenner-to-return-to-house-science-committee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/12/02/sensenbrenner-to-return-to-house-science-committee/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sensenbrenner-to-return-to-house-science-committee</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/12/02/sensenbrenner-to-return-to-house-science-committee/#comment-9470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=1166#comment-9470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure I agree with you about all of Mr. Sensenbrenner&#039;s opinions, but I would consider his return to be very good news.  He has supported the VSE albeit with intelligent suggestions and criticism.  While he is not of my party, I admire his intelligence, his willingness to question constructively, and his independence.  He is the kind of politician we despirately need more of in both major political parties.

-- Donald

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree with you about all of Mr. Sensenbrenner&#8217;s opinions, but I would consider his return to be very good news.  He has supported the VSE albeit with intelligent suggestions and criticism.  While he is not of my party, I admire his intelligence, his willingness to question constructively, and his independence.  He is the kind of politician we despirately need more of in both major political parties.</p>
<p>&#8212; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2006/12/02/sensenbrenner-to-return-to-house-science-committee/#comment-9469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.districtofbaseball.com/spacepolitics/?p=1166#comment-9469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I doubt that NASA will continue receiving the lapdog acquiescence it&#039;s received over the last 1-2 years. Sensenbrenner has always been skeptical of NASA&#039;s big programs. He is also a big advocate of commercial taking on a larger portion of the space role. This likely doesn&#039;t bode well for NASA&#039;s homegrown CLV efforts. However, it&#039;s not the death of VSE. Perhaps it will usher in a more realistic interpretation and implementation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that NASA will continue receiving the lapdog acquiescence it&#8217;s received over the last 1-2 years. Sensenbrenner has always been skeptical of NASA&#8217;s big programs. He is also a big advocate of commercial taking on a larger portion of the space role. This likely doesn&#8217;t bode well for NASA&#8217;s homegrown CLV efforts. However, it&#8217;s not the death of VSE. Perhaps it will usher in a more realistic interpretation and implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
