Comments on: Joint hearing on NASA IG http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 By: Jeff Foust http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13730 Fri, 18 May 2007 09:46:25 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13730 Comments for this post are now closed. A request, particularly for Mr. Elifritz: if you’re unwilling or unable to engage in discussion without resorting to namecalling and foul lanugage, please go elsewhere. Thanks.

]]> By: Thomas Lee Elifritz http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13729 Fri, 18 May 2007 09:08:34 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13729 Oh, did I hurt some anonymous guy’s feelings. I’m so sorry. Me so bad.

]]> By: anonymous http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13724 Fri, 18 May 2007 04:21:47 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13724 “You’re not fooling anyone Cobb, we know that’s you posting.”

LOL… funny.

]]> By: anonymous http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13723 Fri, 18 May 2007 04:21:04 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13723 “You can anonymously bitch… Screw you, anonymous.”

When Mr. Elifritz decides engage the rest of this forum as an adult, I’ll be glad to discuss with him whether there was actually any charges of fraud or criminality in the report against Cobb and whether other Bush Administration failings with regard to the federal budget and the war on terror have any relevance to this Congressional inquiry into the NASA IG.

But if Mr. Elifritz insists on making unprovoked and arguably profane personal attacks and criticizing anonymous comments just for being anonymous — all contrary to the stated desires of the forum administrator –then I have no choice but to ignore him. Argue my opinions and facts, not me.

Once again, I’d recommend to Mr. Foust that he close yet another thread (this one) and consider user bans for such obvious personal attacks, if the software supports them.

]]> By: Thomas Lee Elifritz http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13647 Thu, 17 May 2007 13:52:16 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13647 You can anonymously bitch about congress exercising their legal right to oversight and investigation of fraud and incompetence and criminality in government, but you’ve got nothing to say about a 10 trillion dollar national debt, and a two trillion dollar illegal war of aggression in Iraq?

Screw you, anonymous. You are what’s wrong with America.

]]> By: Chance http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13643 Thu, 17 May 2007 12:13:24 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13643 You’re not fooling anyone Cobb, we know that’s you posting.

]]> By: anonymous http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13642 Thu, 17 May 2007 12:11:14 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/05/15/joint-hearing-on-nasa-ig/#comment-13642 Well, at least Congress is streamlining this apparent waste of time and taxpayer dollars by combining the two hearings into one. I sure hope something is revealed during the hearing that justifies the attention Congress has focused on Cobb and Wholley — and not provided to issues of real importance for NASA’s programs.

]]>