<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007: a space policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/07/19/2007-a-space-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/07/19/2007-a-space-policy/</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:37:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.B.</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/07/19/2007-a-space-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-17896</link>
		<dc:creator>J.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/07/19/2007-a-space-policy/#comment-17896</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really quite a shame that the country which produced men like Francis Drake, Walter Raleigh and James Cook have now decided that human exploration is not worth the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really quite a shame that the country which produced men like Francis Drake, Walter Raleigh and James Cook have now decided that human exploration is not worth the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous.space</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/07/19/2007-a-space-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-17874</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous.space</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/07/19/2007-a-space-policy/#comment-17874</guid>
		<description>&quot;As usual it’s all words and no action.&quot;

And even some of the words are limp-wristed.  What the heck does &quot;a “flexible” stance towards human spaceflight and launch vehicle development&quot; mean?  The BNSC can now take meetings on the topic before they say &quot;no&quot;?

Bleah...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As usual it’s all words and no action.&#8221;</p>
<p>And even some of the words are limp-wristed.  What the heck does &#8220;a “flexible” stance towards human spaceflight and launch vehicle development&#8221; mean?  The BNSC can now take meetings on the topic before they say &#8220;no&#8221;?</p>
<p>Bleah&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cIclops</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/07/19/2007-a-space-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-17871</link>
		<dc:creator>cIclops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/07/19/2007-a-space-policy/#comment-17871</guid>
		<description>As usual it&#039;s all words and no action. The bottom line is that BNSC gets funded with $400m a year, that&#039;s the measure of how serious the UK government is about space. To just match NASA&#039;s % of GDP level, BNSC would need to have $3 billion a year. Now that would buy an interesting space program for the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual it&#8217;s all words and no action. The bottom line is that BNSC gets funded with $400m a year, that&#8217;s the measure of how serious the UK government is about space. To just match NASA&#8217;s % of GDP level, BNSC would need to have $3 billion a year. Now that would buy an interesting space program for the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SurfinOnARocket</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/07/19/2007-a-space-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-17862</link>
		<dc:creator>SurfinOnARocket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/07/19/2007-a-space-policy/#comment-17862</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think we could learn something from the Brits and include more references to Hitchhikers and Star Trek in our reports....maybe then they wouldn&#039;t just collect dust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think we could learn something from the Brits and include more references to Hitchhikers and Star Trek in our reports&#8230;.maybe then they wouldn&#8217;t just collect dust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

