<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on the appropriations veto threat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; White House &#8220;strongly opposes&#8221; NASA authorization bill</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/#comment-52314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; White House &#8220;strongly opposes&#8221; NASA authorization bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/#comment-52314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the SAP does the administration make any threat to veto the bill if approved in its current form, something it has not hesitated to so in the past, particularly with appropriations bills. It is, though, clearly a warning shot across the bow of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the SAP does the administration make any threat to veto the bill if approved in its current form, something it has not hesitated to so in the past, particularly with appropriations bills. It is, though, clearly a warning shot across the bow of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; More good news and bad news for the NASA budget</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/#comment-24408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; More good news and bad news for the NASA budget]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/#comment-24408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have the extra $1 billion the Senate approved earlier this month. The overall appropriations bill still faces a threatened presidential veto. According to a report by the AP, Congress plans this appropriations bill to be one of the first to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] have the extra $1 billion the Senate approved earlier this month. The overall appropriations bill still faces a threatened presidential veto. According to a report by the AP, Congress plans this appropriations bill to be one of the first to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Behrhorst</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/#comment-23660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Behrhorst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/#comment-23660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh...I if feel a soliloquy coming on!

Poor Americanos essentially have an administration that again is defending a slanted war policy based on the ever present fossil fuel &#039;standard energy strategy&#039;. And gaining unpopularity by the minute.
A president who has painted himself in a corner, reticent and attempting to drag his party down in the polls with him as he leaves office. 
I don&#039;t expect to read pronouncements from a &#039;stable sane&#039; administration till a new administration is installed in the White house.

It&#039;s tough to be American on the downslides just have to wait till the next wave comes along.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;I if feel a soliloquy coming on!</p>
<p>Poor Americanos essentially have an administration that again is defending a slanted war policy based on the ever present fossil fuel &#8216;standard energy strategy&#8217;. And gaining unpopularity by the minute.<br />
A president who has painted himself in a corner, reticent and attempting to drag his party down in the polls with him as he leaves office.<br />
I don&#8217;t expect to read pronouncements from a &#8216;stable sane&#8217; administration till a new administration is installed in the White house.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s tough to be American on the downslides just have to wait till the next wave comes along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Messier</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/#comment-23601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. Messier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 01:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/#comment-23601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I can argue with this sort of logic, whatever it might actually be....
But, let&#039;s try to figure this out....

With a &quot;Democrat&quot; Congress, Bush has decided to crack down on spending, something he largely failed to do for two-thirds of his presidency.

Congressional earmarks suddenly seem like a bad idea. I assume that&#039;s what they mean by &quot;micromanaging.&quot; 

Doesn&#039;t support funding &quot;in excess of the request for Science&quot;, hiuh? Is this code for &quot;although I want to look like I&#039;m serious about global warming and science in general, we&#039;ll continue to underfund it while concentrating on almost everything else.&quot;

I&#039;m not sure what the commerce section means about geo-sats, but I imagine they&#039;re worried about the aging weather satellite systems. Has Congress cut this area or diverted money from it?

Inquiring minds want to know....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can argue with this sort of logic, whatever it might actually be&#8230;.<br />
But, let&#8217;s try to figure this out&#8230;.</p>
<p>With a &#8220;Democrat&#8221; Congress, Bush has decided to crack down on spending, something he largely failed to do for two-thirds of his presidency.</p>
<p>Congressional earmarks suddenly seem like a bad idea. I assume that&#8217;s what they mean by &#8220;micromanaging.&#8221; </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t support funding &#8220;in excess of the request for Science&#8221;, hiuh? Is this code for &#8220;although I want to look like I&#8217;m serious about global warming and science in general, we&#8217;ll continue to underfund it while concentrating on almost everything else.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the commerce section means about geo-sats, but I imagine they&#8217;re worried about the aging weather satellite systems. Has Congress cut this area or diverted money from it?</p>
<p>Inquiring minds want to know&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous.space</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/#comment-23566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous.space]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/10/05/more-on-the-appropriations-veto-threat/#comment-23566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, that was quick...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was quick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
