<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reviewing the candidates&#8217; space positions (or lack thereof)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/11/23/reviewing-the-candidates-space-positions-or-lack-thereof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/11/23/reviewing-the-candidates-space-positions-or-lack-thereof/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=reviewing-the-candidates-space-positions-or-lack-thereof</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Leadership in Space at Florida Progressive Coalition Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/11/23/reviewing-the-candidates-space-positions-or-lack-thereof/#comment-34228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[American Leadership in Space at Florida Progressive Coalition Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/11/23/reviewing-the-candidates-space-positions-or-lack-thereof/#comment-34228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Space Politics Â» Reviewing the candidatesâ€™ space positions (or lack thereof) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Space Politics Â» Reviewing the candidatesâ€™ space positions (or lack thereof) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Ignorance is no obstacle to punditry</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/11/23/reviewing-the-candidates-space-positions-or-lack-thereof/#comment-28030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Ignorance is no obstacle to punditry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/11/23/reviewing-the-candidates-space-positions-or-lack-thereof/#comment-28030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] mean that they side with Obama about cutting Constellation or other NASA programs. Recall from this morning&#8217;s post that Giuliani has argued for &#8220;aggressively&#8221; pursuing space exploration, while Romney [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] mean that they side with Obama about cutting Constellation or other NASA programs. Recall from this morning&#8217;s post that Giuliani has argued for &#8220;aggressively&#8221; pursuing space exploration, while Romney [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkWhittington</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/11/23/reviewing-the-candidates-space-positions-or-lack-thereof/#comment-27985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MarkWhittington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/11/23/reviewing-the-candidates-space-positions-or-lack-thereof/#comment-27985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The headline was a loittle bit misleading, albeit technically accurate. Still the Post admitted:

&#039;But the same day, Clinton somewhat muted her support for an aggressive human space exploration program by telling a New York Times reporter that travel to Mars &quot;excites people,&quot; adding that she is &quot;more focused on nearer-term goals I think are achievable.&quot; &#039;

And as predicted the Clinton campaign let Obama have it for his plan to gut Constellation funding.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headline was a loittle bit misleading, albeit technically accurate. Still the Post admitted:</p>
<p>&#8216;But the same day, Clinton somewhat muted her support for an aggressive human space exploration program by telling a New York Times reporter that travel to Mars &#8220;excites people,&#8221; adding that she is &#8220;more focused on nearer-term goals I think are achievable.&#8221; &#8216;</p>
<p>And as predicted the Clinton campaign let Obama have it for his plan to gut Constellation funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
