Comments on: NASA in the budget crosshairs? http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 By: Rand Simberg http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30489 Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:54:53 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30489 No irony. It was a metacomment (a comment about comments). ;-)

]]> By: Chance20_m http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30471 Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:48:55 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30471 You do see the irony of adding another unrelated comment when your complaint is about unrelated comments don’t you?

]]> By: Rand Simberg http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30417 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:50:53 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30417 In that case rand, a very large numberof comments on this site should be deleted.

Yes.

What’s your point? That’s no excuse for adding more that should be.

]]> By: Chance http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30385 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:02:34 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30385 In that case rand, a very large numberof comments on this site should be deleted.

]]> By: Dennis Wingo http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30344 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:34:33 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30344 Space.com reports that LRO is on the verge of starting to slip. Anyone surprised?

Last years budget had an extra $45m for the delays last year. I hear that 2009 is the launch date for a while now.

]]> By: Rand Simberg http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30303 Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:06:14 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30303 Jeff, I will of course respect your blog and your rules, but it is a subject that encompasses both space and politics.

It has absolutely nothing to do with this post.

]]> By: Chance http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30284 Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:32:37 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30284 Jeff, I will of course respect your blog and your rules, but it is a subject that encompasses both space and politics.

]]> By: D. Messier http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30269 Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:50:43 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30269 The ‘pub party candidates apparently called for deep cuts in federal spending today, with Mayor 9-11 promising a 15 percent across-the-board cut. So….NASA is probably screwed if they maintain control of the WH. Be difficult to make deep cuts in the budget and then add money for some moon landing program that will be at least a decade away and only has direct benefits to the white-collar workforce that’s building it.

]]> By: reader http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30244 Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:35:11 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30244 Space.com reports that LRO is on the verge of starting to slip. Anyone surprised?

]]> By: Jeff Foust http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30215 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:08:16 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/11/nasa-in-the-budget-crosshairs/#comment-30215 A reminder that this is a not a forum for missile defense issues. Thanks for your cooperation.

]]>