<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The importance of citing (and vetting) your sources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/16/the-importance-of-citing-and-vetting-your-sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/16/the-importance-of-citing-and-vetting-your-sources/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-importance-of-citing-and-vetting-your-sources</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Dinkin</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/16/the-importance-of-citing-and-vetting-your-sources/#comment-30683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Dinkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/16/the-importance-of-citing-and-vetting-your-sources/#comment-30683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here I was thinking that my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thespacereview.com/article/170/1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recommendation&lt;/a&gt; to auction the space station was influential. Well, if it&#039;s not policy, it&#039;s at least as the butt of a joke, and now of media criticism. The current strategy is not much different than selling it--it&#039;s deorbiting it without selling it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here I was thinking that my <a href="http://www.thespacereview.com/article/170/1" rel="nofollow">recommendation</a> to auction the space station was influential. Well, if it&#8217;s not policy, it&#8217;s at least as the butt of a joke, and now of media criticism. The current strategy is not much different than selling it&#8211;it&#8217;s deorbiting it without selling it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles in Houston</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/16/the-importance-of-citing-and-vetting-your-sources/#comment-30666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles in Houston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/16/the-importance-of-citing-and-vetting-your-sources/#comment-30666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fellow Space Station Watchers -

As Jeff said: 

&quot;The irony of all this is that, in the long run, NASA might well turn over the ISS to its international partners, depending on how the Vision for Space Exploration and the agencyâ€™s finances unfold in the years to come. Selling it on eBay, though, still seems a little unlikelyâ€¦&quot;

How would &quot;turning over the Space Station&quot; work, since the main control center is here in Houston with all the trained controllers and supporting engineering and contracts and ...?? Would someone else (perhaps ESA, perhaps a consortium of universities) buy the control center and hire the engineers needed to run the Space Station? Would they contract for spares and training and all that you would need to keep the Station working? A space station is not like a car where you can buy it and drive it off of the lot. Then buy a new battery at an auto parts store.

What (if anything) was The President thinking when he suggested giving the Space Station away? He certainly had no vague idea of the depth of support needed to keep it working, and the years of training needed to support a space station. 

Certainly we could decide to turn over the Space Station - but it would take many years. Even if you decided to abandon the depth of expertise from the controllers at the Marshall space center in Huntsville, and the knowledge of the engineers at the Kennedy space center that integrated the Station.

Charles]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fellow Space Station Watchers &#8211;</p>
<p>As Jeff said: </p>
<p>&#8220;The irony of all this is that, in the long run, NASA might well turn over the ISS to its international partners, depending on how the Vision for Space Exploration and the agencyâ€™s finances unfold in the years to come. Selling it on eBay, though, still seems a little unlikelyâ€¦&#8221;</p>
<p>How would &#8220;turning over the Space Station&#8221; work, since the main control center is here in Houston with all the trained controllers and supporting engineering and contracts and &#8230;?? Would someone else (perhaps ESA, perhaps a consortium of universities) buy the control center and hire the engineers needed to run the Space Station? Would they contract for spares and training and all that you would need to keep the Station working? A space station is not like a car where you can buy it and drive it off of the lot. Then buy a new battery at an auto parts store.</p>
<p>What (if anything) was The President thinking when he suggested giving the Space Station away? He certainly had no vague idea of the depth of support needed to keep it working, and the years of training needed to support a space station. </p>
<p>Certainly we could decide to turn over the Space Station &#8211; but it would take many years. Even if you decided to abandon the depth of expertise from the controllers at the Marshall space center in Huntsville, and the knowledge of the engineers at the Kennedy space center that integrated the Station.</p>
<p>Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/16/the-importance-of-citing-and-vetting-your-sources/#comment-30653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2007/12/16/the-importance-of-citing-and-vetting-your-sources/#comment-30653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They wouldn&#039;t get more that 500 bucks for it anyhow.  Better to donate the ISS to charity for the tax write-off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They wouldn&#8217;t get more that 500 bucks for it anyhow.  Better to donate the ISS to charity for the tax write-off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
