<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nature measures up the candidates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nature-measures-up-the-candidates</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Biden on space</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-82012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Biden on space]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-82012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] positions on space, but, like the others, didn&#8217;t get a response from. The journal Nature had a little more success in early January, reporting that he &#8220;wants to make China a full partner in space rather than a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] positions on space, but, like the others, didn&#8217;t get a response from. The journal Nature had a little more success in early January, reporting that he &#8220;wants to make China a full partner in space rather than a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Daymont</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Daymont]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson: &lt;i&gt;At best, this is a bipartisan crime.&lt;/i&gt;

Dang Right. 

I&#039;m not trying to just pick on the Clinton administration, just the defense of it&#039;s dealings with the Chinese.  The Senior Bush administration had its problems as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald F. Robertson: <i>At best, this is a bipartisan crime.</i></p>
<p>Dang Right. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to just pick on the Clinton administration, just the defense of it&#8217;s dealings with the Chinese.  The Senior Bush administration had its problems as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark:  So, let me get this right.  The evil Clinton Administration relaxed the rules, &quot;allowing the transfer of technology by Loral and Hughes that had been prohibited.&quot;  When two companies took advantage of this new rule, &quot;the two companies damaged our national security by providing technological assistance that would benefit the Chinese ballistic missile program.&quot;  

Meanwhile, let me draw you to this first paragraph of a story from yesterday&#039;s New York Times,

&lt;i&gt;WASHINGTON â€” Six months ago, the Bush administration quietly eased some restrictions on the export of politically delicate technologies to China. The new approach was intended to help American companies increase sales of high-tech equipment to China despite tight curbs on sharing technology that might have military applications.&lt;/i&gt;

At best, this is a bipartisan crime.  

-- Donald]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark:  So, let me get this right.  The evil Clinton Administration relaxed the rules, &#8220;allowing the transfer of technology by Loral and Hughes that had been prohibited.&#8221;  When two companies took advantage of this new rule, &#8220;the two companies damaged our national security by providing technological assistance that would benefit the Chinese ballistic missile program.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Meanwhile, let me draw you to this first paragraph of a story from yesterday&#8217;s New York Times,</p>
<p><i>WASHINGTON â€” Six months ago, the Bush administration quietly eased some restrictions on the export of politically delicate technologies to China. The new approach was intended to help American companies increase sales of high-tech equipment to China despite tight curbs on sharing technology that might have military applications.</i></p>
<p>At best, this is a bipartisan crime.  </p>
<p>&#8212; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Daymont</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Daymont]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson: &lt;i&gt;Okay, in that case, Loral and Hughes did nothing wrong and should not have had to withstand the subsequent witch-hunt.&lt;/i&gt;

Unfortunately, your conclusion is again in error and contradicted by the facts. In 1998 the House committee chaired by Representative Chris Cox (R-California) turned in a 700 page report stating that the two companies damaged our national security by providing technological assistance that would benefit the Chinese ballistic missile program.  The news media declared the panel&#039;s efforts to be a rare show of bipartisanship effort.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald F. Robertson: <i>Okay, in that case, Loral and Hughes did nothing wrong and should not have had to withstand the subsequent witch-hunt.</i></p>
<p>Unfortunately, your conclusion is again in error and contradicted by the facts. In 1998 the House committee chaired by Representative Chris Cox (R-California) turned in a 700 page report stating that the two companies damaged our national security by providing technological assistance that would benefit the Chinese ballistic missile program.  The news media declared the panel&#8217;s efforts to be a rare show of bipartisanship effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, in that case, Loral and Hughes did nothing wrong and should not have had to withstand the subsequent witch-hunt.   

-- Donald]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, in that case, Loral and Hughes did nothing wrong and should not have had to withstand the subsequent witch-hunt.   </p>
<p>&#8212; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Daymont</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Daymont]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson: &lt;i&gt;Give me a break. First, if it was done at all, it was two private companies that did this; the Clinton Administration had nothing to do with it.&lt;/i&gt;

Your claim is not supported by facts.  The Clinton Administration issued a waiver in 1998 allowing the transfer of technology by Loral and Hughes that had been prohibited.  This issuance interfered in the Justice department probe of the illegal sales.  The Justice department clearly stated that this situation threatened U.S. security.  This situation was well documented at the time.  

History will not give the Clinton apologists any breaks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald F. Robertson: <i>Give me a break. First, if it was done at all, it was two private companies that did this; the Clinton Administration had nothing to do with it.</i></p>
<p>Your claim is not supported by facts.  The Clinton Administration issued a waiver in 1998 allowing the transfer of technology by Loral and Hughes that had been prohibited.  This issuance interfered in the Justice department probe of the illegal sales.  The Justice department clearly stated that this situation threatened U.S. security.  This situation was well documented at the time.  </p>
<p>History will not give the Clinton apologists any breaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Daymont:  &lt;i&gt;Clinton administration which made sure China obtained the â€œfull partnerâ€ technology that allowed it to perfect its MIRV ability and advance its submarine-launch ballistic program&lt;/i&gt;

Give me a break.  First, if it was done at all, it was two private companies that did this; the Clinton Administration had nothing to do with it.  Second, by allowing use of Chinese rockets, the Clinton Administration was attempting to support the needs and desires of the commercial space industry.  Had the Administration done the reverse, the other Mark here would be accusing them of being anti-commercial.  Third, we are still paying for the Republican&#039;s disastrous response (applying commercial satellites to ITAR controls), which is doing more to destroy our commercial space industry than anything the Democrats are likely to do. 

-- Donald]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Daymont:  <i>Clinton administration which made sure China obtained the â€œfull partnerâ€ technology that allowed it to perfect its MIRV ability and advance its submarine-launch ballistic program</i></p>
<p>Give me a break.  First, if it was done at all, it was two private companies that did this; the Clinton Administration had nothing to do with it.  Second, by allowing use of Chinese rockets, the Clinton Administration was attempting to support the needs and desires of the commercial space industry.  Had the Administration done the reverse, the other Mark here would be accusing them of being anti-commercial.  Third, we are still paying for the Republican&#8217;s disastrous response (applying commercial satellites to ITAR controls), which is doing more to destroy our commercial space industry than anything the Democrats are likely to do. </p>
<p>&#8212; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Daymont</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Daymont]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Joe Biden is in the same camp as the former Clinton administration which made sure China obtained the &quot;full partner&quot; technology that allowed it to perfect its MIRV ability and advance its submarine-launch ballistic program.  Until China stops making Internet attacks against the Pentagon, stops aiming lasers at our satellites, and turns away over 600 ballistic missiles aimed at our democratic trade partner Taiwan, I at least feel China has no place working with our space program at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Joe Biden is in the same camp as the former Clinton administration which made sure China obtained the &#8220;full partner&#8221; technology that allowed it to perfect its MIRV ability and advance its submarine-launch ballistic program.  Until China stops making Internet attacks against the Pentagon, stops aiming lasers at our satellites, and turns away over 600 ballistic missiles aimed at our democratic trade partner Taiwan, I at least feel China has no place working with our space program at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reader</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/03/nature-measures-up-the-candidates/#comment-32609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zero information content, under space anyway. &quot;Broadly support&quot;, &quot;Aggressively support&quot;, &quot;exploration&quot;, &quot;Absolutely committed&quot;

Im reminded of honorable Imperial Chancellor Lord Dorwin visiting the Foundation in the early years, speaking about imperial support of Foundation for five days and carefully managing to say absolutely nothing in the process. 
If only we had our own Salvor Hardin to make it evident.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zero information content, under space anyway. &#8220;Broadly support&#8221;, &#8220;Aggressively support&#8221;, &#8220;exploration&#8221;, &#8220;Absolutely committed&#8221;</p>
<p>Im reminded of honorable Imperial Chancellor Lord Dorwin visiting the Foundation in the early years, speaking about imperial support of Foundation for five days and carefully managing to say absolutely nothing in the process.<br />
If only we had our own Salvor Hardin to make it evident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
