<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No time for Giuliani to talk space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/09/no-time-for-giuliani-to-talk-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/09/no-time-for-giuliani-to-talk-space/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=no-time-for-giuliani-to-talk-space</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Fansome</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/09/no-time-for-giuliani-to-talk-space/#comment-33674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Fansome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/09/no-time-for-giuliani-to-talk-space/#comment-33674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No mention of COTS either.  He does not even use the word &quot;commercial&quot;.

I don&#039;t expect that in a one paragraph statement, but in a policy statement this long, it shows up as &quot;missing&quot;.

I am not ready or willing to pull a Whittington, but I think we should be asking/challenging the Obama campaign to expand on this.

- Al]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention of COTS either.  He does not even use the word &#8220;commercial&#8221;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t expect that in a one paragraph statement, but in a policy statement this long, it shows up as &#8220;missing&#8221;.</p>
<p>I am not ready or willing to pull a Whittington, but I think we should be asking/challenging the Obama campaign to expand on this.</p>
<p>&#8211; Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The People</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/09/no-time-for-giuliani-to-talk-space/#comment-33664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The People]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/09/no-time-for-giuliani-to-talk-space/#comment-33664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares what Guliani thinks. It appears, however, that Obama&#039;s campaign has submitted a summary of its position on space

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=26647

It actually looks very good. Apart from its endorsement of Ares I, it looks reasonable. The most noteworthy item for this forum is that there is no mention of human exploration beyond LEO. However, the emphasis on robotic exploration is clear.

Obama is the Man!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares what Guliani thinks. It appears, however, that Obama&#8217;s campaign has submitted a summary of its position on space</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=26647" rel="nofollow">http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=26647</a></p>
<p>It actually looks very good. Apart from its endorsement of Ares I, it looks reasonable. The most noteworthy item for this forum is that there is no mention of human exploration beyond LEO. However, the emphasis on robotic exploration is clear.</p>
<p>Obama is the Man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
