Comments on: O’Keefe endorses McCain http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=okeefe-endorses-mccain Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 By: Bruce Behrhorst http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35938 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:46:06 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35938 Birds of a feather flock together when you’re trying to make NASA the biggest space bureaucracy on the planet.

]]> By: D. Messier http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35901 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:00:34 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35901 And your point is….?

]]> By: Keith Cowing http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35891 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:29:04 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35891 Doug: “I don’t even need to respond to this.”

But you did respond.

]]> By: actionforspace.com http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35883 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:51:00 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35883 I got an email from someone in the McCain campaign talking about his space policy that I have posted some of at actionforspace.com

]]> By: gm http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35847 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:59:07 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35847 a (possible) solution for the Ares-1 “vibrations” problem:
http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/022novibrations.html

]]> By: D. Messier http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35837 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:07:04 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35837 Your comments speak for themselves, really. I don’t even need to respond to this.

]]> By: Keith Cowing http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35833 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 05:28:16 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35833 Gee Doug, where exactly did the first presidential dedication to space exploration in a generation come from …. you know, the one you complain has been under funded? Just who was it that was whispering in Bush’s ear?

If you are going to complain about Bush’s obvious under funding of something you think has merit (otherwise why complain about the under funding?) you can’t dump on the original architect of the plan that you feel is under funded.

OK – you can whine now.

]]> By: D. Messier http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35830 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:36:45 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35830 Well, that ought to put McCain over the top. :-) It definitely locks up the “Sean O’Keefe Was the Second Coming of Jim Webb” vote.

]]> By: J.B. http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35820 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:55:45 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35820 I do think it’s worthy of note that the McCain campaign even bothered to do a press release about this. 99% of Americans have never heard of O’Keefe and have no idea who he is. Such a press release can only have had an intended audience of pro-space voters, especially in Florida. One wonders why the McCain folks did this when the earlier release on space policy was so utterly lacking in substance.

]]> By: Mr Earl http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35819 Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:52:14 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/01/28/okeefe-endorses-mccain/#comment-35819 I would think that this endorsement has more to do with their relationship during O’Keefe’s time in the Pentagon not NASA.

]]>