I wonder if this Orion Standing Review Board situation gets raised. I’m certainly not expert in federal law, but none of NASA’s explanations ring true. Their review of SRB rules seems like a delaying tactic that won’t change anything much.

Does anyone know what exactly happens when the IG says they broke the law and NASA management tells them to frak off? Does it get referred to DOJ? Would Justice take it seriously?

Since they’re aiming for a one-year authorization, there should be a slightly better chance of passage. The legislation won’t tie the new Administration’s hands after the election or otherwise set policy in stone for a long period of time. That should make the bill less controversial and more palatable than a normal, three-year authorization.

“NASA authorization legislation, in general, has a horrible record of getting passed. And this is an election year.”

That said, you’re right that the chances of passage are always poor to begin with, and election years increase the difficulty. The key will be keeping the legislation simple and free of controversy and moving swiftly through the early going in subcommittee and committee.

FWIW…

NASA authorization legislation, in general, has a horrible record of getting passed. And this is an election year.

– Al

FWIW…