<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A tale of two bills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/06/12/a-tale-of-two-bills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/06/12/a-tale-of-two-bills/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-tale-of-two-bills</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Senate subcommittee approves NASA appropriations bill</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/06/12/a-tale-of-two-bills/#comment-53790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Senate subcommittee approves NASA appropriations bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/06/12/a-tale-of-two-bills/#comment-53790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The details of the bill haven&#8217;t been disclosed yet, although the topline figure is similar to what the subcommittee&#8217;s counterpart in the House approved last week. Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), chair of the subcommittee, issued a brief statement about the bill, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The details of the bill haven&#8217;t been disclosed yet, although the topline figure is similar to what the subcommittee&#8217;s counterpart in the House approved last week. Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), chair of the subcommittee, issued a brief statement about the bill, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/06/12/a-tale-of-two-bills/#comment-53227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Library: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/06/12/a-tale-of-two-bills/#comment-53227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A tale of two bills - Space Politics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A tale of two bills &#8211; Space Politics [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/06/12/a-tale-of-two-bills/#comment-52613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/06/12/a-tale-of-two-bills/#comment-52613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mollohan&#039;s release does mention the following space-related provision:

&quot;Within the funds provided for climate data, the bill provides $74 million for restoring important climate sensors to several satellites â€“ GOES-R and NPOESS. There is no doubt about the need and importance of satellites, but they are an expensive proposition. To that end, the bill includes direction to the OSTP to develop a plan for commercial purchase of weather, environmental and space weather data.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mollohan&#8217;s release does mention the following space-related provision:</p>
<p>&#8220;Within the funds provided for climate data, the bill provides $74 million for restoring important climate sensors to several satellites â€“ GOES-R and NPOESS. There is no doubt about the need and importance of satellites, but they are an expensive proposition. To that end, the bill includes direction to the OSTP to develop a plan for commercial purchase of weather, environmental and space weather data.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/06/12/a-tale-of-two-bills/#comment-52612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/06/12/a-tale-of-two-bills/#comment-52612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting amendment: &quot;In section 504, strike `and high-altitude balloons,&#039; and insert `high-altitude balloons, and suborbital reusable launch vehicles,&#039;.&quot;

The original sentence in section 504: &quot;It is further the sense of Congress that suborbital flight activities, including the use of sounding rockets, aircraft, and high-altitude balloons, offer valuable opportunities to advance science, train the next generation of scientists and engineers, and provide opportunities for participants in the programs to acquire skills in systems engineering and systems integration that are critical to maintaining the Nation&#039;s leadership in space programs.&quot;

For any Presidential candidates thinking about using large chunks of NASA funding for educational programs, this Sense of Congress gives a better approach that helps both education and space at the same time:

&quot;It is the sense of Congress that NASA&#039;s educational programs are important sources of inspiration and hands-on learning for the next generation of engineers and scientists and should be supported. In that regard, programs such as EarthKAM, which brings NASA directly into American classrooms by enabling students to talk directly with Astronauts aboard International Space Station and take photographs of Earth from space, and NASA involvement in robotics competitions for students of all levels, are particularly worthy undertakings and NASA should support them and look for additional opportunities to engage students through NASA&#039;s space and aeronautics activities.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting amendment: &#8220;In section 504, strike `and high-altitude balloons,&#8217; and insert `high-altitude balloons, and suborbital reusable launch vehicles,&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>The original sentence in section 504: &#8220;It is further the sense of Congress that suborbital flight activities, including the use of sounding rockets, aircraft, and high-altitude balloons, offer valuable opportunities to advance science, train the next generation of scientists and engineers, and provide opportunities for participants in the programs to acquire skills in systems engineering and systems integration that are critical to maintaining the Nation&#8217;s leadership in space programs.&#8221;</p>
<p>For any Presidential candidates thinking about using large chunks of NASA funding for educational programs, this Sense of Congress gives a better approach that helps both education and space at the same time:</p>
<p>&#8220;It is the sense of Congress that NASA&#8217;s educational programs are important sources of inspiration and hands-on learning for the next generation of engineers and scientists and should be supported. In that regard, programs such as EarthKAM, which brings NASA directly into American classrooms by enabling students to talk directly with Astronauts aboard International Space Station and take photographs of Earth from space, and NASA involvement in robotics competitions for students of all levels, are particularly worthy undertakings and NASA should support them and look for additional opportunities to engage students through NASA&#8217;s space and aeronautics activities.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
