<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s detailed space policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamas-detailed-space-policy</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; The insignificance of space policy in the 2012 campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/#comment-377275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; The insignificance of space policy in the 2012 campaign]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1704#comment-377275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] space is a sharp contrast to 2008. By this point (the beginning of September) in the 2008 campaign, the Obama campaign had released a detailed space policy white paper, just a few days after the John McCain campaign released its own policy paper. At that time, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] space is a sharp contrast to 2008. By this point (the beginning of September) in the 2008 campaign, the Obama campaign had released a detailed space policy white paper, just a few days after the John McCain campaign released its own policy paper. At that time, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Growing budget deficits may have scuttled an &#8220;inspiring&#8221; Obama space program</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/#comment-360094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Growing budget deficits may have scuttled an &#8220;inspiring&#8221; Obama space program]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1704#comment-360094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for president in 2008, Obama &#8220;had promised a bold space program&#8221;, a reference to his space policy white paper the campaign released in August 2008. However, according to the New Yorker article, those plans [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] for president in 2008, Obama &#8220;had promised a bold space program&#8221;, a reference to his space policy white paper the campaign released in August 2008. However, according to the New Yorker article, those plans [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Holiday briefs: Ares, Orion, commercial, and broken promises</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/#comment-336650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Holiday briefs: Ares, Orion, commercial, and broken promises]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1704#comment-336650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of these policy changes in the last year, though, represent a significant change from Obama&#8217;s 2008 campaign white paper on space policy, which included an endorsement of the Vision for Space Exploration&#8217;s central goal of a human [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of these policy changes in the last year, though, represent a significant change from Obama&#8217;s 2008 campaign white paper on space policy, which included an endorsement of the Vision for Space Exploration&#8217;s central goal of a human [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/#comment-146959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1704#comment-146959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m seriously disheartened by the lack of knowledge on our space industry and just who it was who killed our space program. LBJ and his team killed our space program and turned it into a private pork project for Congress, the Senate and the Presidents. The Space Treaty killed any real incentive for extensive space exploration.

LBJ was by far the worst President for space we&#039;ve had.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seriously disheartened by the lack of knowledge on our space industry and just who it was who killed our space program. LBJ and his team killed our space program and turned it into a private pork project for Congress, the Senate and the Presidents. The Space Treaty killed any real incentive for extensive space exploration.</p>
<p>LBJ was by far the worst President for space we&#8217;ve had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Fulda</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/#comment-84458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fulda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1704#comment-84458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a retired political scientist and life-long space advocate, with some
experience in fashioning presidential campaign space policies, I am
delighted that the Obama campaign has produced a comprehensive
space policy relatively early in the campaign calendar. Previous space
pronouncements were snippets developed by a skeletal primary
campaign issue staff with little policy or budgetary guidance. This
is now the real thing, the policy declaration of the Obama campaign
fashioned, one presumes, with the blessing of the candidate and the National Democratic Party, including its key constituents at the congressional level.

The Obama space policy is a comprehensive civilian space policy
referenced to national security space and  foreign policies, and science and technology and science education policies. The civilian space policy
budget assumes filibuster proof- Democratic party control of congress, a speedy end to the Iraq war and the repeal of the Bush tax cuts. The Obama space policy could have been written by a consensus of pro-space organizations (Lagrange points, indeed!) Bravo, Lori and colleagues. This triumph should make up for the heartache of not being able to raise the money to hitch a ride on the Soyuzâ€¦]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a retired political scientist and life-long space advocate, with some<br />
experience in fashioning presidential campaign space policies, I am<br />
delighted that the Obama campaign has produced a comprehensive<br />
space policy relatively early in the campaign calendar. Previous space<br />
pronouncements were snippets developed by a skeletal primary<br />
campaign issue staff with little policy or budgetary guidance. This<br />
is now the real thing, the policy declaration of the Obama campaign<br />
fashioned, one presumes, with the blessing of the candidate and the National Democratic Party, including its key constituents at the congressional level.</p>
<p>The Obama space policy is a comprehensive civilian space policy<br />
referenced to national security space and  foreign policies, and science and technology and science education policies. The civilian space policy<br />
budget assumes filibuster proof- Democratic party control of congress, a speedy end to the Iraq war and the repeal of the Bush tax cuts. The Obama space policy could have been written by a consensus of pro-space organizations (Lagrange points, indeed!) Bravo, Lori and colleagues. This triumph should make up for the heartache of not being able to raise the money to hitch a ride on the Soyuzâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Fansome</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/#comment-78210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Fansome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1704#comment-78210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[â€œAs I recall, she was a huge champion of DC-X (took her 1 year old son to the launch 15 years ago)â€

JOHN:&lt;i&gt;She initially fought like hell against it since it was not a NASA program (it was an evil DoD thing)&lt;/i&gt;

Please be more specific, and provide some specific DATA to back up your assertion.  What did she do (to fight against it), when did she do it?  References would be nice.

â€œIn God we trust; all others must bring data.â€ â€” W. Edwards Deming

The data I see is in conflict with your assertions.  In this April 1994 Space Access update here:

http://www.islandone.org/SpaceAccessUpdates/940405-SAU33.html

&quot;Meanwhile, we hear the National Space Society (NSS) has sent out a letter to all their members asking for donations for an effort to promote SSTO. They too are now saying a lot of the right things about what&#039;s wrong with US space launch policy, and are proposing to do some fairly useful things in the way of advancing SSTO.&quot;

FWIW,

- Al]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œAs I recall, she was a huge champion of DC-X (took her 1 year old son to the launch 15 years ago)â€</p>
<p>JOHN:<i>She initially fought like hell against it since it was not a NASA program (it was an evil DoD thing)</i></p>
<p>Please be more specific, and provide some specific DATA to back up your assertion.  What did she do (to fight against it), when did she do it?  References would be nice.</p>
<p>â€œIn God we trust; all others must bring data.â€ â€” W. Edwards Deming</p>
<p>The data I see is in conflict with your assertions.  In this April 1994 Space Access update here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.islandone.org/SpaceAccessUpdates/940405-SAU33.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.islandone.org/SpaceAccessUpdates/940405-SAU33.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Meanwhile, we hear the National Space Society (NSS) has sent out a letter to all their members asking for donations for an effort to promote SSTO. They too are now saying a lot of the right things about what&#8217;s wrong with US space launch policy, and are proposing to do some fairly useful things in the way of advancing SSTO.&#8221;</p>
<p>FWIW,</p>
<p>&#8211; Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Links - August 20th, Part 2 &#171; The Four Part Land</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/#comment-77665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Daily Links - August 20th, Part 2 &#171; The Four Part Land]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1704#comment-77665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Space Politics Â» Obamaâ€™s detailed space policy [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Space Politics Â» Obamaâ€™s detailed space policy [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/#comment-77488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1704#comment-77488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;While she was head of the NSS it became the â€œNASA Space Societyâ€ which is why competing organizations like the Space Frontier Society saw their membership levels increase.&lt;/em&gt;

It was like that pre-Lori as well.  L-5 was pretty quickly digested by NSI in the merger, and the purpose of NSI was always to build public support for NASA.  She was just doing what the board wanted her to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>While she was head of the NSS it became the â€œNASA Space Societyâ€ which is why competing organizations like the Space Frontier Society saw their membership levels increase.</em></p>
<p>It was like that pre-Lori as well.  L-5 was pretty quickly digested by NSI in the merger, and the purpose of NSI was always to build public support for NASA.  She was just doing what the board wanted her to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/#comment-77462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1704#comment-77462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;As I recall, she was a huge champion of DC-X (took her 1 year old son to the launch 15 years ago)&quot;

She initially fought like hell against it since it was not a NASA program (it was an evil DoD thing) and then bowed in and joined it. While she was head of the NSS it became the &quot;NASA Space Society&quot; which is why competing organizations like the Space Frontier Society saw their membership levels increase.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As I recall, she was a huge champion of DC-X (took her 1 year old son to the launch 15 years ago)&#8221;</p>
<p>She initially fought like hell against it since it was not a NASA program (it was an evil DoD thing) and then bowed in and joined it. While she was head of the NSS it became the &#8220;NASA Space Society&#8221; which is why competing organizations like the Space Frontier Society saw their membership levels increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Hartnett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/08/17/obamas-detailed-space-policy/#comment-77151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norm Hartnett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1704#comment-77151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brief Bio of Ms. Garver, since there doesnâ€™t seem to be one on the web.

1983 Bachelors degree in Political Science and Economics from Colorado College
1989 Masters degree in Science, Technology, and Public Policy from the George Washington University 
1987 Ms. Garver was the Executive Director of the National Space Society, a space advocacy organization. As Executive Director, she served as the organizations&#039; primary spokesperson, appearing on national television and regularly testifying on Capitol Hill.
President of Women in Aerospace.
1996 Special Assistant to Dan Goldin, the NASA Administrator.
1996 Ms. Garver served as a Senior Policy Analyst for the Office of Policy and Plans 1998 Until January 2001 Ms. Garver was the Associate Administrator for Policy and Plans at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), where she oversaw the analysis, development, and integration of NASA policies and long-range plans, the NASA Strategic Management System, the NASA Advisory Council, and History Division.
2000 Honorary Doctorate of Laws from Colorado College
Founder and President of Capital Space LLC, a Virginia-based consulting firm
President of the American Astronautical Association
2001 Astro-Mom http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1003/1
2001 â€“ 2003 Affiliated with DFI International as Director of Space Program Development and later VP of DFI Corporate Services
2003 Senior Advisor for Space at The Avascent Group, a strategic consulting firm
2008 Advisor to the Secure World Foundation. http://www.secureworldfoundation.org

This doesnâ€™t include her political activism that dates back to Senator Glenn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A brief Bio of Ms. Garver, since there doesnâ€™t seem to be one on the web.</p>
<p>1983 Bachelors degree in Political Science and Economics from Colorado College<br />
1989 Masters degree in Science, Technology, and Public Policy from the George Washington University<br />
1987 Ms. Garver was the Executive Director of the National Space Society, a space advocacy organization. As Executive Director, she served as the organizations&#8217; primary spokesperson, appearing on national television and regularly testifying on Capitol Hill.<br />
President of Women in Aerospace.<br />
1996 Special Assistant to Dan Goldin, the NASA Administrator.<br />
1996 Ms. Garver served as a Senior Policy Analyst for the Office of Policy and Plans 1998 Until January 2001 Ms. Garver was the Associate Administrator for Policy and Plans at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), where she oversaw the analysis, development, and integration of NASA policies and long-range plans, the NASA Strategic Management System, the NASA Advisory Council, and History Division.<br />
2000 Honorary Doctorate of Laws from Colorado College<br />
Founder and President of Capital Space LLC, a Virginia-based consulting firm<br />
President of the American Astronautical Association<br />
2001 Astro-Mom <a href="http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1003/1" rel="nofollow">http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1003/1</a><br />
2001 â€“ 2003 Affiliated with DFI International as Director of Space Program Development and later VP of DFI Corporate Services<br />
2003 Senior Advisor for Space at The Avascent Group, a strategic consulting firm<br />
2008 Advisor to the Secure World Foundation. <a href="http://www.secureworldfoundation.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.secureworldfoundation.org</a></p>
<p>This doesnâ€™t include her political activism that dates back to Senator Glenn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
