http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/09/24/sneaking-an-inksna-extension-into-a-cr/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=sneaking-an-inksna-extension-into-a-cr Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/09/24/sneaking-an-inksna-extension-into-a-cr/#comment-127652 Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:55:11 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1741#comment-127652 […] that will fund many federal agencies, including NASA, at FY 2008 levels though early March. Like the version the House approved Wednesday, the Senate version includes language that will extend NASA’s Iran, North Korea, and Syria […]

]]> http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/09/24/sneaking-an-inksna-extension-into-a-cr/#comment-127447 Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:21:34 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1741#comment-127447 […] Sneaking an INKSNA extension into a CR – Space Politics […]

]]> http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/09/24/sneaking-an-inksna-extension-into-a-cr/#comment-124941 Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:04:24 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1741#comment-124941 […] “After reviewing all proposals,” the Feeney release states, the NASA Administrator will select a course of action that best provides crew transfer and rescue services to the International Space Station. $575 million is authorized over three years for developing such access. If a vehicle is successfully demonstrated, NASA would contract with that entity – and not Russia – to transport American astronauts.” The bill would also extend NASA’s INSKNA waiver in a manner similar to S. 3103, but the House has already passed a more expansive waiver. […]

]]>