<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richardson: make sure Obama is pro-commercial space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Richardson speaks out about commercial space again</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/#comment-277154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Richardson speaks out about commercial space again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1781#comment-277154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] comment is similar to remarks he gave in Las Cruces, New Mexico, in October 2008 during the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge. &#8220;[H]ereâ€™s what I want to be sure of: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] comment is similar to remarks he gave in Las Cruces, New Mexico, in October 2008 during the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge. &#8220;[H]ereâ€™s what I want to be sure of: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Commerce, Richardson, and space</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/#comment-146676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Commerce, Richardson, and space]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1781#comment-146676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] policy given his recent comments on the topic of commercial space. As reported here last month, Richardson vowed to make sure &#8220;that the Obama Administration is pro-commercial space&#8221; during comments at a press conference in Las Cruces. (At the same press conference he also said he [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] policy given his recent comments on the topic of commercial space. As reported here last month, Richardson vowed to make sure &#8220;that the Obama Administration is pro-commercial space&#8221; during comments at a press conference in Las Cruces. (At the same press conference he also said he [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Hand off the panic button, please</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/#comment-139623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Hand off the panic button, please]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1781#comment-139623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] space has its advocates in, or connections with, the new administration. Recall what New Mexico governor Bill Richardson said last month: &#8220;But hereâ€™s what I want to be sure of: that the Obama Administration is pro-commercial [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] space has its advocates in, or connections with, the new administration. Recall what New Mexico governor Bill Richardson said last month: &#8220;But hereâ€™s what I want to be sure of: that the Obama Administration is pro-commercial [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/#comment-136372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1781#comment-136372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;I never used the word â€œderangedâ€. I said you are â€œangryâ€ and that you â€œcommunicate fearâ€.&lt;/em&gt;

I was referring to the other responses, not yours.

&lt;em&gt;Considering that have denied either, I consider that to be an implied acceptance of my charge â€” that you recognize you are angry, and that you are communicating fear (perhaps intentionally.)&lt;/em&gt;

The charge was so silly I didn&#039;t bother to reply.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I never used the word â€œderangedâ€. I said you are â€œangryâ€ and that you â€œcommunicate fearâ€.</em></p>
<p>I was referring to the other responses, not yours.</p>
<p><em>Considering that have denied either, I consider that to be an implied acceptance of my charge â€” that you recognize you are angry, and that you are communicating fear (perhaps intentionally.)</em></p>
<p>The charge was so silly I didn&#8217;t bother to reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Fansome</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/#comment-136371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Fansome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1781#comment-136371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand,

I never said you were a Republican. (I know you are a libertarian.)  

I never used the word &quot;deranged&quot;.  I said you are &quot;angry&quot; and that you &quot;communicate fear&quot;.

Considering that have denied either, I consider that to be an implied acceptance of my charge -- that you recognize you are angry, and that you are communicating fear (perhaps intentionally.)
 
I am not angry with you.  (I am angry with what has happened to the Republican Party.)

I ask that you to take your off-topic charges elsewhere.

- Al]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand,</p>
<p>I never said you were a Republican. (I know you are a libertarian.)  </p>
<p>I never used the word &#8220;deranged&#8221;.  I said you are &#8220;angry&#8221; and that you &#8220;communicate fear&#8221;.</p>
<p>Considering that have denied either, I consider that to be an implied acceptance of my charge &#8212; that you recognize you are angry, and that you are communicating fear (perhaps intentionally.)</p>
<p>I am not angry with you.  (I am angry with what has happened to the Republican Party.)</p>
<p>I ask that you to take your off-topic charges elsewhere.</p>
<p>&#8211; Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/#comment-136340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1781#comment-136340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al, why are you lecturing me about Republicans?  I&#039;m not a Republican, and never have been.

&lt;em&gt;You have made up your mind, and in your anger you only look for pieces of data that fit your conclusion, and ignore everything else. You are compelled to do this. Passionate about finding that latest gotcha, that you leap at anything that might help you confirm your views.&lt;/em&gt;

While I was never going to vote for Obama, I didn&#039;t have a big problem with him initially, until I started to learn more about him, and I learned things that he has struggled mightily, and with much success (aided by a fawning press) to keep hidden from most of the voters.  Now that these things are finally coming out, you&#039;re angry with &lt;b&gt;me&lt;/b&gt;?

Let&#039;s review the bidding.  I simply pointed out an inconvenient reality about Barack Obama to one of the mesmerized.  The response was not to rebut it, or say &quot;I didn&#039;t know that,&quot; but to accuse me of drinking koolaid and to call me deranged.

I think that the psychological term for this is called &quot;projection.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al, why are you lecturing me about Republicans?  I&#8217;m not a Republican, and never have been.</p>
<p><em>You have made up your mind, and in your anger you only look for pieces of data that fit your conclusion, and ignore everything else. You are compelled to do this. Passionate about finding that latest gotcha, that you leap at anything that might help you confirm your views.</em></p>
<p>While I was never going to vote for Obama, I didn&#8217;t have a big problem with him initially, until I started to learn more about him, and I learned things that he has struggled mightily, and with much success (aided by a fawning press) to keep hidden from most of the voters.  Now that these things are finally coming out, you&#8217;re angry with <b>me</b>?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s review the bidding.  I simply pointed out an inconvenient reality about Barack Obama to one of the mesmerized.  The response was not to rebut it, or say &#8220;I didn&#8217;t know that,&#8221; but to accuse me of drinking koolaid and to call me deranged.</p>
<p>I think that the psychological term for this is called &#8220;projection.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Fansome</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/#comment-136327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Fansome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1781#comment-136327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RAND: &lt;i&gt;I also think that if we are going to discuss Obamaâ€™s space policy, it is a legitimate part of that discussion to point out that he is a disingenuous and misleading man.&lt;/i&gt;

Rand,

I have read your blog.  I used to respect your thinking.   But you have totally lost it.  You only anger these days.  You only communicate fear.  And mud sling.  And name call.

As a man of reason, you are committing a fallacy of logic.  You have made up your mind, and in your anger you only look for pieces of data that fit your conclusion, and ignore everything else.  You are compelled to do this.  Passionate about finding that latest gotcha, that you leap at anything that might help you confirm your views.  You have doing this for months.

You like to talk about &quot;fascists&quot;, and have repeatedly suggested/implied that Obama is fascist.  But in your anger, it appears that you have missed where the fascist tendencies truly are emerging.

The hate and anger and fear being stirred up by McCain over the last month is the bringing out the worst in people.  The Republicans only have fear and hate to run on.  

Republicans used to be the party of hope &amp; optimism &amp; reason &amp; principal.  It was Not any more.  

Where is the hope &amp; optimism?  Where is the reason &amp; principal?  

I love THAT party.  Where is it?

Where is the party of Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, and Newt Gingrich&#039;s &quot;Contract with America&quot;?

It is gone.  It has been taken over by the ghost of Tom Delay in the current form of Shawn Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and Sarah Palin.  Instead of a party of ideas, we have bumper-sticker campaigning.  The growing anti-intellectualism of those who are left in the Republican party is being driven by fear and anger.

They have nothing to be for, so they can only run on what they are against.

And now YOU are only communicating fear and anger  That is all you have ... fear &amp; anger.

In other words, you have lost it.

- Al

PS -- I could easily go back to McCain&#039;s history and selectively pick out facts to paint a story of a disingenous and misleading man.  But I will not.  Doing so would be a logical fallacy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RAND: <i>I also think that if we are going to discuss Obamaâ€™s space policy, it is a legitimate part of that discussion to point out that he is a disingenuous and misleading man.</i></p>
<p>Rand,</p>
<p>I have read your blog.  I used to respect your thinking.   But you have totally lost it.  You only anger these days.  You only communicate fear.  And mud sling.  And name call.</p>
<p>As a man of reason, you are committing a fallacy of logic.  You have made up your mind, and in your anger you only look for pieces of data that fit your conclusion, and ignore everything else.  You are compelled to do this.  Passionate about finding that latest gotcha, that you leap at anything that might help you confirm your views.  You have doing this for months.</p>
<p>You like to talk about &#8220;fascists&#8221;, and have repeatedly suggested/implied that Obama is fascist.  But in your anger, it appears that you have missed where the fascist tendencies truly are emerging.</p>
<p>The hate and anger and fear being stirred up by McCain over the last month is the bringing out the worst in people.  The Republicans only have fear and hate to run on.  </p>
<p>Republicans used to be the party of hope &amp; optimism &amp; reason &amp; principal.  It was Not any more.  </p>
<p>Where is the hope &amp; optimism?  Where is the reason &amp; principal?  </p>
<p>I love THAT party.  Where is it?</p>
<p>Where is the party of Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, and Newt Gingrich&#8217;s &#8220;Contract with America&#8221;?</p>
<p>It is gone.  It has been taken over by the ghost of Tom Delay in the current form of Shawn Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and Sarah Palin.  Instead of a party of ideas, we have bumper-sticker campaigning.  The growing anti-intellectualism of those who are left in the Republican party is being driven by fear and anger.</p>
<p>They have nothing to be for, so they can only run on what they are against.</p>
<p>And now YOU are only communicating fear and anger  That is all you have &#8230; fear &amp; anger.</p>
<p>In other words, you have lost it.</p>
<p>&#8211; Al</p>
<p>PS &#8212; I could easily go back to McCain&#8217;s history and selectively pick out facts to paint a story of a disingenous and misleading man.  But I will not.  Doing so would be a logical fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monte Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/#comment-136308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monte Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1781#comment-136308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[anon: &lt;i&gt;You forgot to add that SDI broke the camelâ€™s back and ended the cold war.&lt;/i&gt;

Possibly because it isn&#039;t true, no matter how often it&#039;s repeated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anon: <i>You forgot to add that SDI broke the camelâ€™s back and ended the cold war.</i></p>
<p>Possibly because it isn&#8217;t true, no matter how often it&#8217;s repeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/#comment-136307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1781#comment-136307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is nothing &quot;deranged&quot; or &quot;over the edge&quot; about it.  But Obama supporters seem to get upset when you point out that the halo is tarnished.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing &#8220;deranged&#8221; or &#8220;over the edge&#8221; about it.  But Obama supporters seem to get upset when you point out that the halo is tarnished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Robles</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/26/richardson-make-sure-obama-is-pro-commercial-space/#comment-136303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Robles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1781#comment-136303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Please take the hyperbolic comments elsewhere. You clearly have gone over the edge in this election.&quot;

You should see his blog.  It&#039;s one long obsessive rant about Obama.  Obama Derangement Syndrome.  He went over the edge a long time ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Please take the hyperbolic comments elsewhere. You clearly have gone over the edge in this election.&#8221;</p>
<p>You should see his blog.  It&#8217;s one long obsessive rant about Obama.  Obama Derangement Syndrome.  He went over the edge a long time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
