<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lesson learned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/29/lesson-learned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/29/lesson-learned/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lesson-learned</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hillhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/10/29/lesson-learned/#comment-136811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hillhouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 23:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1784#comment-136811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What? No comments from anonymous.space, from me, from any of the Obama apologists about the McCain campaign&#039;s clarification that NASA is in fact exempt from the &quot;freeze&quot;?

You guys asked for this language, I worked my butt off, along with others, to get this, and then nothing you have nothing to say? Why is that? Is it because you know, deep in your heart of hearts, that you misrepresented our campaign and our candidate when it came to funding of Space and NASA because your own candidate, the one who was against Space before he was (maybe) for it. 

All of you who criticized McCain for not explicitly stating that NASA was exempt, who reamed our campaign and at times me, because we didn&#039;t have this very language, even as I told you that in fact the campaign had exempted NASA and was being all but called a liar by the above mentioned...individuals, have shown yourselves to be nothing but partisan hacks.

Here is a fact none of the Obamapologists can deny--John McCain was for Space before he was for it and is the only, get that? ONLY, candidate that got Space before he got it, and therefore is the only candidate to vote for if Space is a critical concern for you.

And for those who will argue that Space isn&#039;t everything? Isn&#039;t this site called Space Politics?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? No comments from anonymous.space, from me, from any of the Obama apologists about the McCain campaign&#8217;s clarification that NASA is in fact exempt from the &#8220;freeze&#8221;?</p>
<p>You guys asked for this language, I worked my butt off, along with others, to get this, and then nothing you have nothing to say? Why is that? Is it because you know, deep in your heart of hearts, that you misrepresented our campaign and our candidate when it came to funding of Space and NASA because your own candidate, the one who was against Space before he was (maybe) for it. </p>
<p>All of you who criticized McCain for not explicitly stating that NASA was exempt, who reamed our campaign and at times me, because we didn&#8217;t have this very language, even as I told you that in fact the campaign had exempted NASA and was being all but called a liar by the above mentioned&#8230;individuals, have shown yourselves to be nothing but partisan hacks.</p>
<p>Here is a fact none of the Obamapologists can deny&#8211;John McCain was for Space before he was for it and is the only, get that? ONLY, candidate that got Space before he got it, and therefore is the only candidate to vote for if Space is a critical concern for you.</p>
<p>And for those who will argue that Space isn&#8217;t everything? Isn&#8217;t this site called Space Politics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
