<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The White House as a &#8220;bully pulpit&#8221; for science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/12/07/the-white-house-as-a-bully-pulpit-for-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/12/07/the-white-house-as-a-bully-pulpit-for-science/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-white-house-as-a-bully-pulpit-for-science</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zinfab</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/12/07/the-white-house-as-a-bully-pulpit-for-science/#comment-152137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zinfab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1834#comment-152137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve always drank the space-ade. 

Bush&#039;s VSE speech is the best thing about his administration, as far as I was concerned. Then, like other great plans of his, he ignored his promise to fund it. He promised an increase in NASA budget, but never requested an increase. Congressional supporters had to over-budget him in funding legislation.

All that said, I&#039;m leery of Obama&#039;s commitment to human space-flight. Jack, I&#039;m all with you on returning to the moon, and going on to Mars. I simply don&#039;t care if it&#039;s an R or a D in the office that takes us there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always drank the space-ade. </p>
<p>Bush&#8217;s VSE speech is the best thing about his administration, as far as I was concerned. Then, like other great plans of his, he ignored his promise to fund it. He promised an increase in NASA budget, but never requested an increase. Congressional supporters had to over-budget him in funding legislation.</p>
<p>All that said, I&#8217;m leery of Obama&#8217;s commitment to human space-flight. Jack, I&#8217;m all with you on returning to the moon, and going on to Mars. I simply don&#8217;t care if it&#8217;s an R or a D in the office that takes us there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lassiter</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/12/07/the-white-house-as-a-bully-pulpit-for-science/#comment-152029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Lassiter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1834#comment-152029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I will remind you that the current President put this nation back on course to the moon.&lt;/i&gt;

... and I&#039;ll remind you in return that once he did, he turned his back on the whole effort. That was the last we heard from him about space exploration. Once you turn the wheel, you need to step on the gas. (And yes, ideally you&#039;re in gear.) With regard to space, this administration had a good overall Vision, but then was out to lunch when it needed White House leadership on the national importance of it. It tossed the whole package over to OMB and the agency, who simply cannot provide that kind of leadership.

Remains to be seen whether vision and leadership go together in the Obama White House.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I will remind you that the current President put this nation back on course to the moon.</i></p>
<p>&#8230; and I&#8217;ll remind you in return that once he did, he turned his back on the whole effort. That was the last we heard from him about space exploration. Once you turn the wheel, you need to step on the gas. (And yes, ideally you&#8217;re in gear.) With regard to space, this administration had a good overall Vision, but then was out to lunch when it needed White House leadership on the national importance of it. It tossed the whole package over to OMB and the agency, who simply cannot provide that kind of leadership.</p>
<p>Remains to be seen whether vision and leadership go together in the Obama White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferris Valyn</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/12/07/the-white-house-as-a-bully-pulpit-for-science/#comment-151975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferris Valyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1834#comment-151975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack,

If this is &quot;putting the nation back on course to the moon&quot;, sadly, he had the selector in the R position.  

Of course, if you want to go forward, you put it in the D position..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,</p>
<p>If this is &#8220;putting the nation back on course to the moon&#8221;, sadly, he had the selector in the R position.  </p>
<p>Of course, if you want to go forward, you put it in the D position..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/12/07/the-white-house-as-a-bully-pulpit-for-science/#comment-151973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Burton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1834#comment-151973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some real adults? 

Some of you have been drinking the Obama-ade.

I will remind you that the current President put this nation back on course to the moon. 

Lecture all you like in the white house.
Means nothing unless they actually support the asctions.

Sadly, Obama aides have been asking about scaling back Orion.
Sad. Hopefully they won&#039;t do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some real adults? </p>
<p>Some of you have been drinking the Obama-ade.</p>
<p>I will remind you that the current President put this nation back on course to the moon. </p>
<p>Lecture all you like in the white house.<br />
Means nothing unless they actually support the asctions.</p>
<p>Sadly, Obama aides have been asking about scaling back Orion.<br />
Sad. Hopefully they won&#8217;t do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/12/07/the-white-house-as-a-bully-pulpit-for-science/#comment-151867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1834#comment-151867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am in full agreement with Obama regarding the importance of science.   For almost a decade it has been relegated to the back seat in this industry, with funding now at roughly half of the levels it had prior to Columbia&#039;s loss.

With the human spaceflight infrastructure designed currently to expand it&#039;s share of NASA&#039;s funding from current levels around $6-7bn per year to $11-12bn per year, this situation is currently destined to get even worse.

We need a more affordable solution than Ares IMHO.   The &quot;1.5 launch solution&quot; is only going to suck all the air out of the room and leave us with no returns on our investment.   And that means it will be a major candidate for outright cancellation -- exactly as happened to Apollo.

We shouldn&#039;t be doing this at all if we are actually choosing solutions which lead to early cancellation.

We should be planning systems which have the word &quot;sustainability&quot; carved through every element of their very structures.   If we don&#039;t do that, we&#039;re wasting everyone&#039;s time and effort.

Ross.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in full agreement with Obama regarding the importance of science.   For almost a decade it has been relegated to the back seat in this industry, with funding now at roughly half of the levels it had prior to Columbia&#8217;s loss.</p>
<p>With the human spaceflight infrastructure designed currently to expand it&#8217;s share of NASA&#8217;s funding from current levels around $6-7bn per year to $11-12bn per year, this situation is currently destined to get even worse.</p>
<p>We need a more affordable solution than Ares IMHO.   The &#8220;1.5 launch solution&#8221; is only going to suck all the air out of the room and leave us with no returns on our investment.   And that means it will be a major candidate for outright cancellation &#8212; exactly as happened to Apollo.</p>
<p>We shouldn&#8217;t be doing this at all if we are actually choosing solutions which lead to early cancellation.</p>
<p>We should be planning systems which have the word &#8220;sustainability&#8221; carved through every element of their very structures.   If we don&#8217;t do that, we&#8217;re wasting everyone&#8217;s time and effort.</p>
<p>Ross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve&#8217;s No Direction Home Page &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The White House as a &#8220;bully pulpit&#8221; for science</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/12/07/the-white-house-as-a-bully-pulpit-for-science/#comment-151507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve&#8217;s No Direction Home Page &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The White House as a &#8220;bully pulpit&#8221; for science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1834#comment-151507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The White House as a &#8220;bully pulpit&#8221; for science: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The White House as a &#8220;bully pulpit&#8221; for science: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceMan</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2008/12/07/the-white-house-as-a-bully-pulpit-for-science/#comment-151499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpaceMan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1834#comment-151499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like there are about to be some real adults in control come January 20th. And not a moment too soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like there are about to be some real adults in control come January 20th. And not a moment too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
