<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Years roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-years-roundup</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/#comment-164831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1873#comment-164831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s my &lt;a href=&quot;http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/media-botches-story-on-obamas-nasa-plans/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;debunking&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/media-botches-story-on-obamas-nasa-plans/" rel="nofollow">debunking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/#comment-164387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1873#comment-164387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;I think the most interesting thing about it is (1) its claim that military space assets would be used to bridge the gap between the Space Shuttle and Constellation, and (2) that the effort is directed against China.&lt;/em&gt;

Both claims are nonsense.  This is not what the incoming administration is planning.  I&#039;ll probably have a piece up debunking it, with transition team input, tomorrow at Pajamas Media.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I think the most interesting thing about it is (1) its claim that military space assets would be used to bridge the gap between the Space Shuttle and Constellation, and (2) that the effort is directed against China.</em></p>
<p>Both claims are nonsense.  This is not what the incoming administration is planning.  I&#8217;ll probably have a piece up debunking it, with transition team input, tomorrow at Pajamas Media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Yamada</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/#comment-164257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Yamada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1873#comment-164257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff, as always, thanks for this blog.

I read the Bloomberg article. I think the most interesting thing about it is (1) its claim that military space assets would be used to bridge the gap between the Space Shuttle and Constellation, and (2) that the effort is directed against China. If anything, it seems like Russia, not China, is the real reason to make sure there is a manned space option after 2011. (I assume an INKSNA exemption to pay billions a year to a country that invaded a democratic, if erratic, ally is not going to pass.) Thoughts?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, as always, thanks for this blog.</p>
<p>I read the Bloomberg article. I think the most interesting thing about it is (1) its claim that military space assets would be used to bridge the gap between the Space Shuttle and Constellation, and (2) that the effort is directed against China. If anything, it seems like Russia, not China, is the real reason to make sure there is a manned space option after 2011. (I assume an INKSNA exemption to pay billions a year to a country that invaded a democratic, if erratic, ally is not going to pass.) Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/#comment-164253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Library: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1873#comment-164253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] New Years roundup - Space Politics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] New Years roundup &#8211; Space Politics [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Cowing</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/#comment-162944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith Cowing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1873#comment-162944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh well, I already published all of Griffin&#039;s and Shana&#039;s speeches online any way ... As for a FOIA if the list - I doubt  that it really matters - and besides anyone can submit a FOIA ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well, I already published all of Griffin&#8217;s and Shana&#8217;s speeches online any way &#8230; As for a FOIA if the list &#8211; I doubt  that it really matters &#8211; and besides anyone can submit a FOIA &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Foust</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/#comment-162892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1873#comment-162892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Jeff, congratulations on making the â€œFriend-of-Mikeâ€ list!&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, I think what happened is that they also sent out the book to the standard list of people who get review copies of NASA History Office publications (which I&#039;m on). That would explain why I got it, rather than a seemingly unlikely promotion to any&quot;FoM&quot; list...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Jeff, congratulations on making the â€œFriend-of-Mikeâ€ list!</i></p>
<p>Actually, I think what happened is that they also sent out the book to the standard list of people who get review copies of NASA History Office publications (which I&#8217;m on). That would explain why I got it, rather than a seemingly unlikely promotion to any&#8221;FoM&#8221; list&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Fansome</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/#comment-162854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Fansome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1873#comment-162854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff, congratulations on making the &quot;Friend-of-Mike&quot; list!

I still wonder ...

1) How many Members of Congress are getting a copy, and

2) How many people in the Obama-Biden transition team are getting copies.

3) Who is Griffin asking to hand-deliver a copy to the President-elect.

BTW, the existence of the online edition changes nothing about my procurement question.

Spending $50k to print 2,500 books, plus the cost of postage, seems (to me) to be a lot of taxpayer money for something we can get online.

  - Al

PS -- The biased distribution of tax-payer-funded books to some members of the space media, but not to others, is another question.  Keith, maybe you should pay them in kind, and do a FOIA to get the list distributees?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, congratulations on making the &#8220;Friend-of-Mike&#8221; list!</p>
<p>I still wonder &#8230;</p>
<p>1) How many Members of Congress are getting a copy, and</p>
<p>2) How many people in the Obama-Biden transition team are getting copies.</p>
<p>3) Who is Griffin asking to hand-deliver a copy to the President-elect.</p>
<p>BTW, the existence of the online edition changes nothing about my procurement question.</p>
<p>Spending $50k to print 2,500 books, plus the cost of postage, seems (to me) to be a lot of taxpayer money for something we can get online.</p>
<p>  &#8211; Al</p>
<p>PS &#8212; The biased distribution of tax-payer-funded books to some members of the space media, but not to others, is another question.  Keith, maybe you should pay them in kind, and do a FOIA to get the list distributees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/#comment-162852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1873#comment-162852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, over 99.99999% of the world&#039;s population didn&#039;t get a copy.  Including me.  Frankly, I can live without.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, over 99.99999% of the world&#8217;s population didn&#8217;t get a copy.  Including me.  Frankly, I can live without.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Cowing</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/#comment-162836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith Cowing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1873#comment-162836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone is getting a copy except for me :-(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is getting a copy except for me <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":-(" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Foust</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/02/new-years-roundup/#comment-162778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1873#comment-162778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, about 10 minutes after I wrote the comment above, the UPS guy arrived at my door with a package containing that book of speeches, &lt;i&gt;Leadership in Space&lt;/i&gt;. (My copy was shipped by UPS Ground rather than Priority Mail, it appears.) Paging through it, the one difference that stands out between the book and the collection of speeches online is that the latter is organized chronologically while the book groups the speeches (a subset of the online collection) into three sections: &quot;Exploration and Our Future&quot;, &quot;NASA, Science, Commerce and Engineering&quot;, and &quot;Getting There from Here&quot;. Also, they&#039;re technically not all speeches: there are a couple of op-eds included as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, about 10 minutes after I wrote the comment above, the UPS guy arrived at my door with a package containing that book of speeches, <i>Leadership in Space</i>. (My copy was shipped by UPS Ground rather than Priority Mail, it appears.) Paging through it, the one difference that stands out between the book and the collection of speeches online is that the latter is organized chronologically while the book groups the speeches (a subset of the online collection) into three sections: &#8220;Exploration and Our Future&#8221;, &#8220;NASA, Science, Commerce and Engineering&#8221;, and &#8220;Getting There from Here&#8221;. Also, they&#8217;re technically not all speeches: there are a couple of op-eds included as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
