Comments on: Saving a nonexistent $100 billion http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/06/saving-a-nonexistent-100-billion/ Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:47:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mike http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/06/saving-a-nonexistent-100-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-164890 Mike Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:37:18 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1886#comment-164890 SpaceMan has it right. Read what else WND has written about lately, like how eating soy-based foods make people gay.... SpaceMan has it right. Read what else WND has written about lately, like how eating soy-based foods make people gay….

]]> By: SpaceMan http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/06/saving-a-nonexistent-100-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-164885 SpaceMan Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:34:59 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1886#comment-164885 <i>apparently ignorant of the Vision for Space Exploration.</i> apparently ignorant of reality. There, fixed it for you. apparently ignorant of the Vision for Space Exploration.

apparently ignorant of reality.

There, fixed it for you.

]]> By: Space Politics » “This story is very strange” http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/01/06/saving-a-nonexistent-100-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-164861 Space Politics » “This story is very strange” Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:47:01 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=1886#comment-164861 [...] it’s not a reference to the Joseph Farah editorial (although it fits), but instead last week’s odd Bloomberg article about alleged NASA-DoD [...] [...] it’s not a reference to the Joseph Farah editorial (although it fits), but instead last week’s odd Bloomberg article about alleged NASA-DoD [...]

]]>