<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More developments in the quest for a NASA administrator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:19:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s NASA Administrator List Thinning With Appointments &#171; Luna C/I: Moon Colonization and Integration</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/comment-page-1/#comment-209692</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s NASA Administrator List Thinning With Appointments &#171; Luna C/I: Moon Colonization and Integration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2117#comment-209692</guid>
		<description>[...] candidate list for the new NASA Administrator (previous being Mike Griffin, who is since working on starting GriffinSpace, LLC) under President [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] candidate list for the new NASA Administrator (previous being Mike Griffin, who is since working on starting GriffinSpace, LLC) under President [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lassiter</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/comment-page-1/#comment-207225</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Lassiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2117#comment-207225</guid>
		<description>Now that John Holdren has been confirmed as OSTP Director, one might expect some action on nominating a NASA administrator. I suspect that the Obama administration sees NASA as working especially closely with OSTP, especially in that Earth science and climate change research will be taking a new priority in the agency. So until they had a confirmed director for OSTP, nailing down a name for NASA Administrator might have been hard to do.

Now, it&#039;s interesting. As of last spring, John Marburger told House Commerce that, with respect to NASA, &quot;probably the highest priority for space operations for this country should be Earth observations,&quot; though his own leadership on that front was decidedly mixed. That OSTP-NASA connection will be a lot tighter in the years ahead, to the extent that NASA is seen as a part of the solution to a problem that is an administration science and technology priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that John Holdren has been confirmed as OSTP Director, one might expect some action on nominating a NASA administrator. I suspect that the Obama administration sees NASA as working especially closely with OSTP, especially in that Earth science and climate change research will be taking a new priority in the agency. So until they had a confirmed director for OSTP, nailing down a name for NASA Administrator might have been hard to do.</p>
<p>Now, it&#8217;s interesting. As of last spring, John Marburger told House Commerce that, with respect to NASA, &#8220;probably the highest priority for space operations for this country should be Earth observations,&#8221; though his own leadership on that front was decidedly mixed. That OSTP-NASA connection will be a lot tighter in the years ahead, to the extent that NASA is seen as a part of the solution to a problem that is an administration science and technology priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon-y-mous</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/comment-page-1/#comment-207212</link>
		<dc:creator>anon-y-mous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2117#comment-207212</guid>
		<description>If certain &quot;public servants&quot; keep torpedoing good candidates who don&#039;t happen to toe the Shuttle workforce line, Obama should just punt on naming a NASA administrator.  Let them go through 2010-2011 under an acting administrator.  Let the shuttle wind itself down, let Ares keep running around like a chicken with its head cut off.  By the time 2011 rolls around, most of the shuttle workforce will have moved on, possibly to other states.  

-FWIW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If certain &#8220;public servants&#8221; keep torpedoing good candidates who don&#8217;t happen to toe the Shuttle workforce line, Obama should just punt on naming a NASA administrator.  Let them go through 2010-2011 under an acting administrator.  Let the shuttle wind itself down, let Ares keep running around like a chicken with its head cut off.  By the time 2011 rolls around, most of the shuttle workforce will have moved on, possibly to other states.  </p>
<p>-FWIW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repugnant Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/comment-page-1/#comment-206738</link>
		<dc:creator>Repugnant Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2117#comment-206738</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Bring back Mike Griffin&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re right, this whole walking upright thing is way overrated. We should right back to knuckle draggin with the republicans, they&#039;ve left us with such a wonderful legacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Bring back Mike Griffin</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, this whole walking upright thing is way overrated. We should right back to knuckle draggin with the republicans, they&#8217;ve left us with such a wonderful legacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Koester</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/comment-page-1/#comment-206602</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Koester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2117#comment-206602</guid>
		<description>A dark horse?  I note that Dr. Alan Stern wikipedia page has a new entry that uses this exact same language as being a possible candidate for the position of NASA Administrator.

Maybe we will all be suprised.

Here are two links that mention Dr. Stern from Universetoday &amp; space.com

http://www.space.com/news/090108-nasa-administrator-candidates.html

http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/09/who-will-be-the-next-nasa-administrator/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A dark horse?  I note that Dr. Alan Stern wikipedia page has a new entry that uses this exact same language as being a possible candidate for the position of NASA Administrator.</p>
<p>Maybe we will all be suprised.</p>
<p>Here are two links that mention Dr. Stern from Universetoday &amp; space.com</p>
<p><a href="http://www.space.com/news/090108-nasa-administrator-candidates.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.space.com/news/090108-nasa-administrator-candidates.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/09/who-will-be-the-next-nasa-administrator/" rel="nofollow">http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/09/who-will-be-the-next-nasa-administrator/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostinspace</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/comment-page-1/#comment-206600</link>
		<dc:creator>lostinspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2117#comment-206600</guid>
		<description>I have at least gotten the impression that Bolden may be a good manager with a clear vision. He might be the best choice of the available candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have at least gotten the impression that Bolden may be a good manager with a clear vision. He might be the best choice of the available candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulture4</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/comment-page-1/#comment-206598</link>
		<dc:creator>vulture4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2117#comment-206598</guid>
		<description>How about the suggestion made during the campaign that maybe NASA should do work of practical value? Given the state of the economy, is this at least worth a thought? Or should we borrow money from China to send Americans to the moon before China?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the suggestion made during the campaign that maybe NASA should do work of practical value? Given the state of the economy, is this at least worth a thought? Or should we borrow money from China to send Americans to the moon before China?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sc220</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/comment-page-1/#comment-206250</link>
		<dc:creator>sc220</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2117#comment-206250</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Charlie Bolden would be a disaster as Administrator - it would allow Yoda (George Abbey) to slink back onto Bldg 1’s ninth floor.&lt;/i&gt;

This is an interesting comment, since we all know that Abbey is not a fan of Ares or ESAS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Charlie Bolden would be a disaster as Administrator &#8211; it would allow Yoda (George Abbey) to slink back onto Bldg 1’s ninth floor.</i></p>
<p>This is an interesting comment, since we all know that Abbey is not a fan of Ares or ESAS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles In Houston</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/comment-page-1/#comment-206249</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles In Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2117#comment-206249</guid>
		<description>Charlie Bolden would be a disaster as Administrator - it would allow Yoda (George Abbey) to slink back onto Bldg 1&#039;s ninth floor. We would be back to the days of Machiavellian scheming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Bolden would be a disaster as Administrator &#8211; it would allow Yoda (George Abbey) to slink back onto Bldg 1&#8217;s ninth floor. We would be back to the days of Machiavellian scheming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sc220</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/03/18/more-developments-in-the-quest-for-a-nasa-administrator/comment-page-1/#comment-206242</link>
		<dc:creator>sc220</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2117#comment-206242</guid>
		<description>Two things that concern me about Bolden. One is that he&#039;s of the narrow mindset that the only thing that&#039;s important about the space program is crewed exploration. I may be jumping to conclusions here, but since he has a long history with human spaceflight, it&#039;s possible that he&#039;d have this view.

The other is his association with ATK. How seriously will he &quot;look under the hood&quot; with this seeming conflict of interest? Besides retirement of the Shuttle, asking the tough questions about Ares and the ESAS architecture is the most important task for the new Administrator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things that concern me about Bolden. One is that he&#8217;s of the narrow mindset that the only thing that&#8217;s important about the space program is crewed exploration. I may be jumping to conclusions here, but since he has a long history with human spaceflight, it&#8217;s possible that he&#8217;d have this view.</p>
<p>The other is his association with ATK. How seriously will he &#8220;look under the hood&#8221; with this seeming conflict of interest? Besides retirement of the Shuttle, asking the tough questions about Ares and the ESAS architecture is the most important task for the new Administrator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
