<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A small victory for export control reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/04/22/a-small-victory-for-export-control-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/04/22/a-small-victory-for-export-control-reform/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-small-victory-for-export-control-reform</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; ITAR confusion</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/04/22/a-small-victory-for-export-control-reform/#comment-236955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; ITAR confusion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 11:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2207#comment-236955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] wait a moment. Wasn&#8217;t this issue resolved last month, when The Economist reported that Bigelow had won an exemption that covered passengers on its orbital...? The issue was the same there: concerns that customers (spaceflight participants) would have to get [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] wait a moment. Wasn&#8217;t this issue resolved last month, when The Economist reported that Bigelow had won an exemption that covered passengers on its orbital&#8230;? The issue was the same there: concerns that customers (spaceflight participants) would have to get [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/04/22/a-small-victory-for-export-control-reform/#comment-230329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2207#comment-230329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My earlier snark aside, if we are worried about espionage, then I still don&#039;t see how such a ban helps.  It is pretty much child&#039;s play for any of the three countries to recruit a third party to collect information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My earlier snark aside, if we are worried about espionage, then I still don&#8217;t see how such a ban helps.  It is pretty much child&#8217;s play for any of the three countries to recruit a third party to collect information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Huntsman</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/04/22/a-small-victory-for-export-control-reform/#comment-229706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Huntsman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2207#comment-229706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If true, I don&#039;t understand including China; and I think it will hurt us.

China is minting still healthy millionaires faster than anyone on the planet; just the type of folks who could be attracted to paying for flying.  And I also don&#039;t understand their not being able to rent a Bigelow module (Bigelow&#039;s stations are for rent, not purchase).  Again, in each case, we&#039;re almost forcing the Chinese, instead of buying American, to develop their own - competing - capability.  

&lt;i&gt;There needs to be a clear, specific, and compelling rationale for that type of restriction that more than offsets the (millions?) of dollars in trade and resultant high-tech jobs that are going to be lost if China continues to be excluded.&lt;/i&gt;.  Does anyone know what that is?  (Seriously, I&quot;m asking).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If true, I don&#8217;t understand including China; and I think it will hurt us.</p>
<p>China is minting still healthy millionaires faster than anyone on the planet; just the type of folks who could be attracted to paying for flying.  And I also don&#8217;t understand their not being able to rent a Bigelow module (Bigelow&#8217;s stations are for rent, not purchase).  Again, in each case, we&#8217;re almost forcing the Chinese, instead of buying American, to develop their own &#8211; competing &#8211; capability.  </p>
<p><i>There needs to be a clear, specific, and compelling rationale for that type of restriction that more than offsets the (millions?) of dollars in trade and resultant high-tech jobs that are going to be lost if China continues to be excluded.</i>.  Does anyone know what that is?  (Seriously, I&#8221;m asking).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/04/22/a-small-victory-for-export-control-reform/#comment-229420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2207#comment-229420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...citizens of some countries (China, Iran, North Korea, and Sudan) would be still not be allowed to fly.&quot;

So, China can hold billions of our debt, not to mention hack into many sensitive computer systems, but can &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; ride on our commercial spaceships?  Yeah.  Okay.  We showed them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;citizens of some countries (China, Iran, North Korea, and Sudan) would be still not be allowed to fly.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, China can hold billions of our debt, not to mention hack into many sensitive computer systems, but can <i>not</i> ride on our commercial spaceships?  Yeah.  Okay.  We showed them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
