<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Briefly noted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/04/briefly-noted-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/04/briefly-noted-2/</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:37:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike shupp</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/04/briefly-noted-2/comment-page-1/#comment-236664</link>
		<dc:creator>mike shupp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2242#comment-236664</guid>
		<description>The irony here, of course, is that The New York Times thoroughly despised manned space programs of any sort during the 1960&#039;s and 1970&#039;s, including Apollo and the space shuttle.  So the ineffectual space program they&#039;re currently pointing at with Great Concern is just the sort of  manned space program the Times always thought we should have.  They should be chortling with glee -- and perhaps would be, if the internet wasn&#039;t driving newspapers into equal insignificance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony here, of course, is that The New York Times thoroughly despised manned space programs of any sort during the 1960&#8242;s and 1970&#8242;s, including Apollo and the space shuttle.  So the ineffectual space program they&#8217;re currently pointing at with Great Concern is just the sort of  manned space program the Times always thought we should have.  They should be chortling with glee &#8212; and perhaps would be, if the internet wasn&#8217;t driving newspapers into equal insignificance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

