<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reviewing Griffin&#8217;s tenure at NASA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/06/reviewing-griffins-tenure-at-nasa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/06/reviewing-griffins-tenure-at-nasa/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=reviewing-griffins-tenure-at-nasa</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yg1968</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/06/reviewing-griffins-tenure-at-nasa/#comment-238192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yg1968]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 04:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2256#comment-238192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting report. A must read!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting report. A must read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artful Dodger</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/06/reviewing-griffins-tenure-at-nasa/#comment-237810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artful Dodger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2256#comment-237810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well one thing is clear from this account - Bush once again reaffirmed his position as the Worst President Ever by putting NASA in its current untenable position of not having enough money to implement the President&#039;s vision!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well one thing is clear from this account &#8211; Bush once again reaffirmed his position as the Worst President Ever by putting NASA in its current untenable position of not having enough money to implement the President&#8217;s vision!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/06/reviewing-griffins-tenure-at-nasa/#comment-237789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2256#comment-237789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Griffin complained about &quot;[OMB] work at the staff level [that] continues out of view of the nationâ€™s elected leadership&quot; in his recent Goddard Dinner speech here:

http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/griffin-goddard-speech.pdf

But per Mr. Foust&#039;s post above, Griffin earlier told Henry Lambright that &quot;the key protagonists&quot; at a key meeting on the NASA budget back in 2005 &quot;were OMB director Bolton and NASA administrator Griffin. President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Science Advisor John Marburger, [and] a State Department representative&quot;.

So which is it?

Did rogue OMB staff cut NASA&#039;s budget without informing their White House principals?

Or did Griffin just lose fights with White House principals on the NASA budget?

It appears that history is being revised, at least in Griffin&#039;s mind, as time goes by.

FWIW...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Griffin complained about &#8220;[OMB] work at the staff level [that] continues out of view of the nationâ€™s elected leadership&#8221; in his recent Goddard Dinner speech here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/griffin-goddard-speech.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/griffin-goddard-speech.pdf</a></p>
<p>But per Mr. Foust&#8217;s post above, Griffin earlier told Henry Lambright that &#8220;the key protagonists&#8221; at a key meeting on the NASA budget back in 2005 &#8220;were OMB director Bolton and NASA administrator Griffin. President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Science Advisor John Marburger, [and] a State Department representative&#8221;.</p>
<p>So which is it?</p>
<p>Did rogue OMB staff cut NASA&#8217;s budget without informing their White House principals?</p>
<p>Or did Griffin just lose fights with White House principals on the NASA budget?</p>
<p>It appears that history is being revised, at least in Griffin&#8217;s mind, as time goes by.</p>
<p>FWIW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
