<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes COTS-D isn&#8217;t COTS-D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/29/sometimes-cots-d-isnt-cots-d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/29/sometimes-cots-d-isnt-cots-d/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sometimes-cots-d-isnt-cots-d</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/29/sometimes-cots-d-isnt-cots-d/#comment-245956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Library: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2352#comment-245956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sometimes COTS-D isnâ€™t COTS-D &#8211; Space Politics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sometimes COTS-D isnâ€™t COTS-D &#8211; Space Politics [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Fansome</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/29/sometimes-cots-d-isnt-cots-d/#comment-245440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Fansome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 22:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2352#comment-245440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As others have ably pointed out, Nelson&#039;s stated logic does not make sense.

I suspect that the &quot;status quo&quot; powers got to Senator Nelson, and we are left with  the best excuse he could come up with for changing his position.

FWIW,

- Al]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others have ably pointed out, Nelson&#8217;s stated logic does not make sense.</p>
<p>I suspect that the &#8220;status quo&#8221; powers got to Senator Nelson, and we are left with  the best excuse he could come up with for changing his position.</p>
<p>FWIW,</p>
<p>&#8211; Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/29/sometimes-cots-d-isnt-cots-d/#comment-245270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 22:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2352#comment-245270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I guess my doubts were founded after all. I may have gotten carried away with overt enthusiasm about Sen. Nelson. I naively thought that he may help uphold the law as it is written for NASA to support commercial endeavors. Very disenchanting. 

As to Scolese comments, very sad too. It may take multiples of $150M to actually get a human-rated vehicle per NASA&#039;s guidelines, but how many multiples until the cost of Ares/Orion? Especially if the eventual sole purpose of Constellation is go to LEO. 

If the leadership cannot get to the realization that it may take awhile but, if there is will, Private space will make it happen with whatever funds they have. If it so happens then NASA&#039;s exploration, especially if limited to LEO, will become irrelevant and obsolete. Then said leadership can go cry to Congress to get any money to do anything that makes sense!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess my doubts were founded after all. I may have gotten carried away with overt enthusiasm about Sen. Nelson. I naively thought that he may help uphold the law as it is written for NASA to support commercial endeavors. Very disenchanting. </p>
<p>As to Scolese comments, very sad too. It may take multiples of $150M to actually get a human-rated vehicle per NASA&#8217;s guidelines, but how many multiples until the cost of Ares/Orion? Especially if the eventual sole purpose of Constellation is go to LEO. </p>
<p>If the leadership cannot get to the realization that it may take awhile but, if there is will, Private space will make it happen with whatever funds they have. If it so happens then NASA&#8217;s exploration, especially if limited to LEO, will become irrelevant and obsolete. Then said leadership can go cry to Congress to get any money to do anything that makes sense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/29/sometimes-cots-d-isnt-cots-d/#comment-245228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2352#comment-245228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So let me get this straight...

Sen. Nelson is interested in throwing federal tax dollars at an empty launch pad that, even after sinking considerable Florida tax dollars into the facility, no one is interested in using and therefore won&#039;t create any ongoing business, jobs, or tax revenue in Florida.

But Sen. Nelson is not interested in accelerating the development of a space transportation capability that NASA and the private sector are interested in using and that would create an ongoing business, jobs, and tax revenue in Florida.

I&#039;m no fan of parochial politics, but if we&#039;re going to twist the nation&#039;s space program and siphon my federal tax dollars to serve Florida, then let&#039;s at least do so intelligently in a way that actually benefits Florida.

How idiotic...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me get this straight&#8230;</p>
<p>Sen. Nelson is interested in throwing federal tax dollars at an empty launch pad that, even after sinking considerable Florida tax dollars into the facility, no one is interested in using and therefore won&#8217;t create any ongoing business, jobs, or tax revenue in Florida.</p>
<p>But Sen. Nelson is not interested in accelerating the development of a space transportation capability that NASA and the private sector are interested in using and that would create an ongoing business, jobs, and tax revenue in Florida.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m no fan of parochial politics, but if we&#8217;re going to twist the nation&#8217;s space program and siphon my federal tax dollars to serve Florida, then let&#8217;s at least do so intelligently in a way that actually benefits Florida.</p>
<p>How idiotic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceMan</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/29/sometimes-cots-d-isnt-cots-d/#comment-245198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpaceMan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2352#comment-245198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the block quote citation markup doesn&#039;t work here is the URL for the Medicare quote in my post above

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the block quote citation markup doesn&#8217;t work here is the URL for the Medicare quote in my post above</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all" rel="nofollow">http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceMan</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/29/sometimes-cots-d-isnt-cots-d/#comment-245194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpaceMan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2352#comment-245194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;The fiscal black hole called Ares&lt;/i&gt;

Nonsense.

The fiscal black hole called the bank bailout &amp; the DoD would be more likely targets not to mention the &lt;strong&gt;REAL&lt;/strong&gt; federal budget problem, medical cost growth.

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all&quot;&gt;
&quot;...If we brought the cost curve in the expensive places down to their level, Medicareâ€™s problems (indeed, &lt;strong&gt;almost all the federal governmentâ€™s budget problems for the next fifty years&lt;/strong&gt;) would be solved....&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Be honest and pay attention to the whole picture not just your pet area.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The fiscal black hole called Ares</i></p>
<p>Nonsense.</p>
<p>The fiscal black hole called the bank bailout &amp; the DoD would be more likely targets not to mention the <strong>REAL</strong> federal budget problem, medical cost growth.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all"><p>
&#8220;&#8230;If we brought the cost curve in the expensive places down to their level, Medicareâ€™s problems (indeed, <strong>almost all the federal governmentâ€™s budget problems for the next fifty years</strong>) would be solved&#8230;.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Be honest and pay attention to the whole picture not just your pet area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Boozer</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/05/29/sometimes-cots-d-isnt-cots-d/#comment-245157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Boozer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2352#comment-245157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;â€œWe just simply donâ€™t have the funding appropriated at this time to execute the option or pursue any other COTS-D capability at this time,â€&lt;/i&gt;

The reason?  The fiscal black hole called Ares.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>â€œWe just simply donâ€™t have the funding appropriated at this time to execute the option or pursue any other COTS-D capability at this time,â€</i></p>
<p>The reason?  The fiscal black hole called Ares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
