<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passing the audition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/07/09/passing-the-audition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/07/09/passing-the-audition/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=passing-the-audition</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chronik des Universums: erste Juli-HÃ¤lfte 2009 &#171; Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/07/09/passing-the-audition/#comment-263419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronik des Universums: erste Juli-HÃ¤lfte 2009 &#171; Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2443#comment-263419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] der heutigen AnhÃ¶rung gibt es wohl keinen Zweifel, dass C. Bolden neuer NASA-Chef [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] der heutigen AnhÃ¶rung gibt es wohl keinen Zweifel, dass C. Bolden neuer NASA-Chef [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amiable Hermit</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/07/09/passing-the-audition/#comment-258010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amiable Hermit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2443#comment-258010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it is my belief that what you wrote is applicable to the Direct Team as well as the Commercial Ventures... they saw an approach that was not being explored fully in the current technological climate, and chose to do something about it... yesterday after 3 1/2 years they got what they had always asked for, an independent review by industry experts (Areospace Corp) with 4 hours of questioning... 
     I don&#039;t count on one architecture to do the whole job, be it Earth to ISS or LEO, or Earth to LMO, Landing and setting up Moon Bases or LO ISS, and fuel depots at L1 or L2, or the next step to take man and robots to Mars Orbit and Landing, or NEO... I believe that all possible permutations of existing and developing LV&#039;s and Space Vehicles need to be considered and worked on, each suited to their mission capabilites... it has been the sad reality, that we have depended on single LV and Space Vehicle capabilities for 60 years and now we must loose that mindset and develop a fleet that we can take to Space UTILIZATION... Exploration of Deep Space by 2030, ie Mars and beyond yes; but begin NOW in the next 15 years the Utilization of LEO and the Space between Earth and the Moon for the use of ALL MANKIND... Like Bolden said, we MUST get to the point, and soon, when any person, with the desire and good reason, has access to Space at a reasonable cost... either as researcher, Astronaut, or space tourist... 
  it took the areonautic industry less than 40 years to go from a novelty to commerciallization, where travel across vast distance by people carriers was common place... if we take the end of WW2 as the novelty stage, we have spent way too long in the pioneer stage of rocket development... let&#039;s get on with it... 
btw, I was born in 1948... so I have waited a long time to see this day... ;( and I am impatient to see results ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is my belief that what you wrote is applicable to the Direct Team as well as the Commercial Ventures&#8230; they saw an approach that was not being explored fully in the current technological climate, and chose to do something about it&#8230; yesterday after 3 1/2 years they got what they had always asked for, an independent review by industry experts (Areospace Corp) with 4 hours of questioning&#8230;<br />
     I don&#8217;t count on one architecture to do the whole job, be it Earth to ISS or LEO, or Earth to LMO, Landing and setting up Moon Bases or LO ISS, and fuel depots at L1 or L2, or the next step to take man and robots to Mars Orbit and Landing, or NEO&#8230; I believe that all possible permutations of existing and developing LV&#8217;s and Space Vehicles need to be considered and worked on, each suited to their mission capabilites&#8230; it has been the sad reality, that we have depended on single LV and Space Vehicle capabilities for 60 years and now we must loose that mindset and develop a fleet that we can take to Space UTILIZATION&#8230; Exploration of Deep Space by 2030, ie Mars and beyond yes; but begin NOW in the next 15 years the Utilization of LEO and the Space between Earth and the Moon for the use of ALL MANKIND&#8230; Like Bolden said, we MUST get to the point, and soon, when any person, with the desire and good reason, has access to Space at a reasonable cost&#8230; either as researcher, Astronaut, or space tourist&#8230;<br />
  it took the areonautic industry less than 40 years to go from a novelty to commerciallization, where travel across vast distance by people carriers was common place&#8230; if we take the end of WW2 as the novelty stage, we have spent way too long in the pioneer stage of rocket development&#8230; let&#8217;s get on with it&#8230;<br />
btw, I was born in 1948&#8230; so I have waited a long time to see this day&#8230; ;( and I am impatient to see results <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habitat Hermit</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/07/09/passing-the-audition/#comment-257677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habitat Hermit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2443#comment-257677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Extremely good point by Michael Mealling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely good point by Michael Mealling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mealling</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/07/09/passing-the-audition/#comment-257519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Mealling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2443#comment-257519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bolden&#039;s last statement before hearing from Udall&#039;s &quot;save WSMR, please&quot; question was most interesting. I went through the video and transcribed it:

&quot;Franklin Chang-Diaz who is my idol, another astronaut who now is in the entrepreneurial space business, has a VASIMER rocket engine that if it works, and I think it will, will take us to Mars in 39 days instead of 8-11 months. NASA provided him a VERY small stipend to get started to bring his project to Technology Readiness Level 1,2 and 3. And now he&#039;s at the point where its ready to fly but he has done that with what they call venture capitalists, private investors. That&#039;s what Lori and I talk about. We can&#039;t, the government can not fund everything we need to do. But we can inspire and open the door for commercial, entrepreneurial entities to become involved, to be come partners with NASA in this research and development that will enabled things to come about. No, you can&#039;t make enough money for NASA to do the things that I think you want to do. But together we can inspire young people to want to put their money that they do have and are looking for places to invest into science and technology and together I think we will go back to the moon and eventually we will go on to Mars and other places even deeper into the solar system.&quot;

Inspiring kids to try and do slightly better in math is good, but if you can inspire them to invest their own money in space ventures as adults then you&#039;ve really done something useful. IMHO, the true legacy of Apollo is Elon, Bezos, Branson, Carmack, Tito, Bigelow, etc who saw what was possible and decided to go do it themselves instead of waiting on the Government to do it for them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolden&#8217;s last statement before hearing from Udall&#8217;s &#8220;save WSMR, please&#8221; question was most interesting. I went through the video and transcribed it:</p>
<p>&#8220;Franklin Chang-Diaz who is my idol, another astronaut who now is in the entrepreneurial space business, has a VASIMER rocket engine that if it works, and I think it will, will take us to Mars in 39 days instead of 8-11 months. NASA provided him a VERY small stipend to get started to bring his project to Technology Readiness Level 1,2 and 3. And now he&#8217;s at the point where its ready to fly but he has done that with what they call venture capitalists, private investors. That&#8217;s what Lori and I talk about. We can&#8217;t, the government can not fund everything we need to do. But we can inspire and open the door for commercial, entrepreneurial entities to become involved, to be come partners with NASA in this research and development that will enabled things to come about. No, you can&#8217;t make enough money for NASA to do the things that I think you want to do. But together we can inspire young people to want to put their money that they do have and are looking for places to invest into science and technology and together I think we will go back to the moon and eventually we will go on to Mars and other places even deeper into the solar system.&#8221;</p>
<p>Inspiring kids to try and do slightly better in math is good, but if you can inspire them to invest their own money in space ventures as adults then you&#8217;ve really done something useful. IMHO, the true legacy of Apollo is Elon, Bezos, Branson, Carmack, Tito, Bigelow, etc who saw what was possible and decided to go do it themselves instead of waiting on the Government to do it for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/07/09/passing-the-audition/#comment-257215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2443#comment-257215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yawn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
