<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virginia is (still) for spaceport lovers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/08/15/virginia-is-still-for-spaceport-lovers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/08/15/virginia-is-still-for-spaceport-lovers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=virginia-is-still-for-spaceport-lovers</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Briefly noted</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/08/15/virginia-is-still-for-spaceport-lovers/#comment-280807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Briefly noted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2533#comment-280807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that we can aggressively recruit aerospace companies and promote space tourism initiatives.&#8221; McDonnell supported continued development of MARS during last year&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] that we can aggressively recruit aerospace companies and promote space tourism initiatives.&#8221; McDonnell supported continued development of MARS during last year&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
