<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A step towards ITAR reform, or something else?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/15/a-step-towards-itar-reform-or-something-else/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/15/a-step-towards-itar-reform-or-something-else/</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/15/a-step-towards-itar-reform-or-something-else/comment-page-1/#comment-271515</link>
		<dc:creator>Library: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2659#comment-271515</guid>
		<description>[...] A step towards ITAR reform, or something else? &#8211; Space Politics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A step towards ITAR reform, or something else? &#8211; Space Politics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/15/a-step-towards-itar-reform-or-something-else/comment-page-1/#comment-271201</link>
		<dc:creator>Major Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2659#comment-271201</guid>
		<description>Hopefully any backlash isn&#039;t strong enough to derail wider ongoing ITAR reform efforts.  It would have been nice to have some of those in the bag before this move was made.

FWIW...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully any backlash isn&#8217;t strong enough to derail wider ongoing ITAR reform efforts.  It would have been nice to have some of those in the bag before this move was made.</p>
<p>FWIW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Habitat Hermit</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/15/a-step-towards-itar-reform-or-something-else/comment-page-1/#comment-271182</link>
		<dc:creator>Habitat Hermit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2659#comment-271182</guid>
		<description>Since it&#039;s a specific measure towards China it&#039;s tempting to assume it&#039;s probably just a trade to continue increasing the US deficit. What else would it be if it only relates to China?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it&#8217;s a specific measure towards China it&#8217;s tempting to assume it&#8217;s probably just a trade to continue increasing the US deficit. What else would it be if it only relates to China?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

