Comments on: A step towards ITAR reform, or something else? http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/15/a-step-towards-itar-reform-or-something-else/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=a-step-towards-itar-reform-or-something-else Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway... Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 By: Library: A Round-up of Reading « Res Communis http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/15/a-step-towards-itar-reform-or-something-else/#comment-271515 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:15:28 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2659#comment-271515 […] A step towards ITAR reform, or something else? – Space Politics […]

]]> By: Major Tom http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/15/a-step-towards-itar-reform-or-something-else/#comment-271201 Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:53:45 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2659#comment-271201 Hopefully any backlash isn’t strong enough to derail wider ongoing ITAR reform efforts. It would have been nice to have some of those in the bag before this move was made.

FWIW…

]]> By: Habitat Hermit http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/15/a-step-towards-itar-reform-or-something-else/#comment-271182 Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:42:21 +0000 http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2659#comment-271182 Since it’s a specific measure towards China it’s tempting to assume it’s probably just a trade to continue increasing the US deficit. What else would it be if it only relates to China?

]]>