<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House hearing on NASA technology development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/20/house-hearing-on-nasa-technology-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/20/house-hearing-on-nasa-technology-development/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=house-hearing-on-nasa-technology-development</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/20/house-hearing-on-nasa-technology-development/#comment-271795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2683#comment-271795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Mr. Oâ€™Keefe is and always has been a political hack.&quot;

Yeah, O&#039;Keefe did a real political hack job on NASA -- seeing the agency through the Columbia disaster, getting the White House to agree to a new vision for human space flight after the disaster, securing $1 billion in funding for that vision, and standing up a new organization within NASA to execute it.

We may not agree with all of O&#039;Keefe&#039;s decisions as Administrator, but that doesn&#039;t mean that he&#039;s a political hack or treated the agency as such.

Take your ugly venom elsewhere.

Bleah...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mr. Oâ€™Keefe is and always has been a political hack.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, O&#8217;Keefe did a real political hack job on NASA &#8212; seeing the agency through the Columbia disaster, getting the White House to agree to a new vision for human space flight after the disaster, securing $1 billion in funding for that vision, and standing up a new organization within NASA to execute it.</p>
<p>We may not agree with all of O&#8217;Keefe&#8217;s decisions as Administrator, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that he&#8217;s a political hack or treated the agency as such.</p>
<p>Take your ugly venom elsewhere.</p>
<p>Bleah&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceMan</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/20/house-hearing-on-nasa-technology-development/#comment-271692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpaceMan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2683#comment-271692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. O&#039;Keefe is and always has been a political hack. His move to EADS is good news for Boeing, Lockmart etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. O&#8217;Keefe is and always has been a political hack. His move to EADS is good news for Boeing, Lockmart etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/20/house-hearing-on-nasa-technology-development/#comment-271677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2683#comment-271677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doug Lassiter  if you find more information please let me know...I can give you an email so this could go off list...just curious

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug Lassiter  if you find more information please let me know&#8230;I can give you an email so this could go off list&#8230;just curious</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lassiter</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/20/house-hearing-on-nasa-technology-development/#comment-271634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Lassiter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2683#comment-271634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is somewhat OT, but Sean O&#039;Keefe was shown the door by the governing board of LSU. He didn&#039;t get tired of the ivory tower. At least one ivory tower got tired of him. Reasons are not completely clear, but it just wasn&#039;t a good mix.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is somewhat OT, but Sean O&#8217;Keefe was shown the door by the governing board of LSU. He didn&#8217;t get tired of the ivory tower. At least one ivory tower got tired of him. Reasons are not completely clear, but it just wasn&#8217;t a good mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/20/house-hearing-on-nasa-technology-development/#comment-271617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2683#comment-271617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like Sean O&#039;Keefe has got tired of the ivory tower and would rather help European industry take on the United States:

EADS said Tuesday that former NASA head Sean OKeefe will become chief executive of EADS North America. 

-- Donald]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Sean O&#8217;Keefe has got tired of the ivory tower and would rather help European industry take on the United States:</p>
<p>EADS said Tuesday that former NASA head Sean OKeefe will become chief executive of EADS North America. </p>
<p>&#8212; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics Â» House hearing on NASA technology development &#171; New Emerging Technologies for Netbook Mobile Phones Laptops Gadget and Gizmos</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/20/house-hearing-on-nasa-technology-development/#comment-271573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics Â» House hearing on NASA technology development &#171; New Emerging Technologies for Netbook Mobile Phones Laptops Gadget and Gizmos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2683#comment-271573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics Â» House hearing on NASA technology development &#171; 7 Journals</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/20/house-hearing-on-nasa-technology-development/#comment-271561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics Â» House hearing on NASA technology development &#171; 7 Journals]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2683#comment-271561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source Share/Save [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Source Share/Save [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
