<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A roundup of initial Congressional reaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/#comment-272346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Library: A Round-up of Reading &#171; Res Communis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2710#comment-272346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A roundup of initial Congressional reaction &#8211; Space Politics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A roundup of initial Congressional reaction &#8211; Space Politics [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NelsonBridwell</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/#comment-272027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NelsonBridwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2710#comment-272027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a good thing for Norm that the practice of &quot;shooting the messenger&quot; is no longer in vogue!

Cheers,
    Nelson]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good thing for Norm that the practice of &#8220;shooting the messenger&#8221; is no longer in vogue!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
    Nelson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kert</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/#comment-272003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2710#comment-272003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its so predictable. Sorry but this round of Augustine was failure, because  they provided something for everyone in the report, so people like Giffords can pull selected quotes,
&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Constellation program is being well executed&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

end of story, end of attention span, done committed, move on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its so predictable. Sorry but this round of Augustine was failure, because  they provided something for everyone in the report, so people like Giffords can pull selected quotes,<br />
<b><i>Constellation program is being well executed</i></b></p>
<p>end of story, end of attention span, done committed, move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/#comment-271989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2710#comment-271989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Kudos to coining a term for us space cadets that doesnâ€™t sound condescending.&lt;/em&gt;

Apparently you are impervious to condescension, because it is the height of condescension.  It&#039;s Mark&#039;s little fantasy world.  And he can never tell us the names of his imaginary friends in it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Kudos to coining a term for us space cadets that doesnâ€™t sound condescending.</em></p>
<p>Apparently you are impervious to condescension, because it is the height of condescension.  It&#8217;s Mark&#8217;s little fantasy world.  And he can never tell us the names of his imaginary friends in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aremisasling</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/#comment-271982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aremisasling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2710#comment-271982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Internet Rocketeer Clib&quot;

Aside from the typo, I love this label for the online space community.  Kudos to coining a term for us space cadets that doesn&#039;t sound condescending.

Aremis]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Internet Rocketeer Clib&#8221;</p>
<p>Aside from the typo, I love this label for the online space community.  Kudos to coining a term for us space cadets that doesn&#8217;t sound condescending.</p>
<p>Aremis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goff</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/#comment-271969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Goff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2710#comment-271969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark,
Yeah, it definitely is a bit of a Rorschach test isn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Yeah, it definitely is a bit of a Rorschach test isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics Â» A roundup of initial Congressional reaction &#171; News</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/#comment-271940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics Â» A roundup of initial Congressional reaction &#171; News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2710#comment-271940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Space Politics Â» A roundup of initial Congressional reaction   Comments [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Space Politics Â» A roundup of initial Congressional reaction   Comments [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark R. Whittington</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/#comment-271928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark R. Whittington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2710#comment-271928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The interesting thing about the Augustine Report is that it seems to say whatever the reader wants it to say. The Internet Rocketeer Clib seems to think it condemns the current program, even though it specifically states that it is sound. Certain members of Congress seem to think that it supports the current program, though it does suggest some interesting alternatives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting thing about the Augustine Report is that it seems to say whatever the reader wants it to say. The Internet Rocketeer Clib seems to think it condemns the current program, even though it specifically states that it is sound. Certain members of Congress seem to think that it supports the current program, though it does suggest some interesting alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goff</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/#comment-271919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Goff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2710#comment-271919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it funny that half of the responses start with the word &quot;While&quot;...

&quot;While a group of aerospace engineers investigated what the country ought to do, I only care about keeping warm cafeteria seats in my district, so I&#039;m going to ignore the 95% of the report that points out the current approach is an unaffordable waste of time, and just demand that the president wire more money...&quot;

...sigh...

~Jon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it funny that half of the responses start with the word &#8220;While&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;While a group of aerospace engineers investigated what the country ought to do, I only care about keeping warm cafeteria seats in my district, so I&#8217;m going to ignore the 95% of the report that points out the current approach is an unaffordable waste of time, and just demand that the president wire more money&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;sigh&#8230;</p>
<p>~Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/10/22/a-roundup-of-initial-congressional-reaction/#comment-271899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2710#comment-271899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And of course, just as I post that I flip on NASA TV and there they are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course, just as I post that I flip on NASA TV and there they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
