<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More letter writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=more-letter-writing</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Letter writing update</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/#comment-274000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Letter writing update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2740#comment-274000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you recall last week&#8217;s post about a bipartisan &#8220;Dear Colleagues&#8221; letter to drum up support for increasing NASA&#8217;s bud..., there&#8217;s a minor update. According to an updated blog post on NSS.org, the deadline for [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you recall last week&#8217;s post about a bipartisan &#8220;Dear Colleagues&#8221; letter to drum up support for increasing NASA&#8217;s bud&#8230;, there&#8217;s a minor update. According to an updated blog post on NSS.org, the deadline for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/#comment-273816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2740#comment-273816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;No one is forcing you to be the â€œfactâ€ checker [sic] to the world.&quot;

No one is forcing you to repeatedly post inaccurate and false statements.

&quot;Its [sic] your choice.&quot;

It is my choice, and I chose to correct inaccurate and false statements.

Do your homework, and I and other posters will have nothing to correct.

Why is that so hard to understand?

FWIW...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No one is forcing you to be the â€œfactâ€ checker [sic] to the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>No one is forcing you to repeatedly post inaccurate and false statements.</p>
<p>&#8220;Its [sic] your choice.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is my choice, and I chose to correct inaccurate and false statements.</p>
<p>Do your homework, and I and other posters will have nothing to correct.</p>
<p>Why is that so hard to understand?</p>
<p>FWIW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/#comment-273568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2740#comment-273568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Major Tom

No one is forcing you to be the &quot;fact&quot; checker to the world. Its your choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Major Tom</p>
<p>No one is forcing you to be the &#8220;fact&#8221; checker to the world. Its your choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/#comment-273421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2740#comment-273421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loki wrote @ November 6th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

@

They want the people back home, especially those whose livelyhoods depend on the space program to think theyâ€™re doing something to fight for them, when in reality they couldnâ€™t give 2 ^*#@s about the space program no matter how many jobs are brought to their district...

pretty much.  few of them have a clue about what is going on

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loki wrote @ November 6th, 2009 at 3:52 pm</p>
<p>@</p>
<p>They want the people back home, especially those whose livelyhoods depend on the space program to think theyâ€™re doing something to fight for them, when in reality they couldnâ€™t give 2 ^*#@s about the space program no matter how many jobs are brought to their district&#8230;</p>
<p>pretty much.  few of them have a clue about what is going on</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/#comment-273420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2740#comment-273420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anon 

but the &quot;increase&quot; is in the 600 million range (right from the article) not a 4 billion increase and that increase (the 600 million) has to be negotiated with the House which passed a lower number...so who knows what the final number will turn out to be.

This all continues the status quo until some decision is made by the administration on &quot;what&quot; comes next

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon </p>
<p>but the &#8220;increase&#8221; is in the 600 million range (right from the article) not a 4 billion increase and that increase (the 600 million) has to be negotiated with the House which passed a lower number&#8230;so who knows what the final number will turn out to be.</p>
<p>This all continues the status quo until some decision is made by the administration on &#8220;what&#8221; comes next</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/#comment-273416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2740#comment-273416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;What vision? Obama hasnâ€™t articulated any kind of vision yet, &quot;

Well yes and no: http://www.fladems.com/page/-/Obama_Space.pdf

It&#039;s as much a Vision as anyone&#039;s...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What vision? Obama hasnâ€™t articulated any kind of vision yet, &#8221;</p>
<p>Well yes and no: <a href="http://www.fladems.com/page/-/Obama_Space.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.fladems.com/page/-/Obama_Space.pdf</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s as much a Vision as anyone&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/#comment-273411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2740#comment-273411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;They want the people back home, especially those whose livelyhoods depend on the space program to think theyâ€™re doing something to fight for them, when in reality they couldnâ€™t give 2 ^*#@s about the space program no matter how many jobs are brought to their district.&quot;

Also a viable, even likely, explanation.

FWIW...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They want the people back home, especially those whose livelyhoods depend on the space program to think theyâ€™re doing something to fight for them, when in reality they couldnâ€™t give 2 ^*#@s about the space program no matter how many jobs are brought to their district.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also a viable, even likely, explanation.</p>
<p>FWIW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/#comment-273402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2740#comment-273402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Either that, or they really are incompetentâ€¦&lt;/em&gt;

I vote for both.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Either that, or they really are incompetentâ€¦</em></p>
<p>I vote for both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/#comment-273397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2740#comment-273397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Major Tom:
At the risk of sounding like someone who needs to be fitted for a tin foil hat, I suspect they wait until this late hour to protest on purpose.  

They want the people back home, especially those whose livelyhoods depend on the space program to think they&#039;re doing something to fight for them, when in reality they couldn&#039;t give 2 ^*#@s about the space program no matter how many jobs are brought to their district.

Either that, or they really are incompetent...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Major Tom:<br />
At the risk of sounding like someone who needs to be fitted for a tin foil hat, I suspect they wait until this late hour to protest on purpose.  </p>
<p>They want the people back home, especially those whose livelyhoods depend on the space program to think they&#8217;re doing something to fight for them, when in reality they couldn&#8217;t give 2 ^*#@s about the space program no matter how many jobs are brought to their district.</p>
<p>Either that, or they really are incompetent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/05/more-letter-writing/#comment-273391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2740#comment-273391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s not fall over ourselves making a mountain out of a molehill here.  So the senate bill included $18.7 billion for NASA.  Big deal, it&#039;s still $3 billion short of what the Augustine committee claims is needed to have a &quot;meaningful&quot; exploration program.  Not that I had any expectations that congress would magically endorse that extra money, but a small increase over and above Obama&#039;s budget request would have been nice.  If for no other reason than to show that the message was recieved, and as Major Tom pointed the compromise bill will probably be somewhere in between the senate and house&#039;s numbers.

From the article &quot;In a strong show of support for President Barack Obamaâ€™s vision for NASA...&quot;
What vision?  Obama hasn&#039;t articulated any kind of vision yet, unless I nodded off and missed his grand &quot;Kennedy moment&quot;.  Did I?  The article referenced is crummy journalism at best if that&#039;s its opening statement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not fall over ourselves making a mountain out of a molehill here.  So the senate bill included $18.7 billion for NASA.  Big deal, it&#8217;s still $3 billion short of what the Augustine committee claims is needed to have a &#8220;meaningful&#8221; exploration program.  Not that I had any expectations that congress would magically endorse that extra money, but a small increase over and above Obama&#8217;s budget request would have been nice.  If for no other reason than to show that the message was recieved, and as Major Tom pointed the compromise bill will probably be somewhere in between the senate and house&#8217;s numbers.</p>
<p>From the article &#8220;In a strong show of support for President Barack Obamaâ€™s vision for NASA&#8230;&#8221;<br />
What vision?  Obama hasn&#8217;t articulated any kind of vision yet, unless I nodded off and missed his grand &#8220;Kennedy moment&#8221;.  Did I?  The article referenced is crummy journalism at best if that&#8217;s its opening statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
