<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;and speaking of hearings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/17/and-speaking-of-hearings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/17/and-speaking-of-hearings/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=and-speaking-of-hearings</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; More details on the commercial space transportation hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/17/and-speaking-of-hearings/#comment-276204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; More details on the commercial space transportation hearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2782#comment-276204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] about Wednesday&#8217;s hearing by its aviation subcommittee on commercial space transportation. As noted here a couple weeks ago, the hearing does appear based, at least in part, on a 2006 GAO report about the FAA&#8217;s Office [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] about Wednesday&#8217;s hearing by its aviation subcommittee on commercial space transportation. As noted here a couple weeks ago, the hearing does appear based, at least in part, on a 2006 GAO report about the FAA&#8217;s Office [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Double jeopardy for commercial space next Wednesday?</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/11/17/and-speaking-of-hearings/#comment-275432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Double jeopardy for commercial space next Wednesday?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2782#comment-275432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Committee. No hearing information, including planned witnesses, has been released, although as previously noted here the chairman of the full committee, James Oberstar, has been critical of commercial space [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Committee. No hearing information, including planned witnesses, has been released, although as previously noted here the chairman of the full committee, James Oberstar, has been critical of commercial space [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
